A daily dose of philosophical food for your noodle... bacon for your brain!

Saturday, January 31, 2009

Eating on a Budget

By Diana Hsieh

Some of you might remember Ari and Jennifer Armstrong's Food Stamp Challenge in 2007. They ate within a tight budget of less than three dollars per day per person for a month -- and they did so largely by eating real, whole nutrient-dense foods rather than expensive, nutrient-poor processed foods. They ate things that I wouldn't eat, but overall their diet was extremely healthy -- particularly in comparison to the Standard American Diet.

Not long ago, I discovered someone who did the same for his family -- limiting them to the new food stamp allotment of just under six dollars per day per person -- but she eats the same kind of paleo-ish diet of real foods that I do. So see what she bought with a week's grocery budget of $121. It's impressive.

It's remarkably expensive to eat processed foods and restaurant foods, including fast food. I'm not on a strict food budget -- so I enjoy some luxuries like raw milk, raw cheese, and farm eggs -- but it's certainly possible to eat very, very well with strict budget constraints.

Read more...

Forget Substitutes: Eat Real Food

By Diana Hsieh

Cooking in Our Cave explains why better eating shouldn't be about substituting foods. Here's the opening:

When people begin a new way of eating, they often look to 'substitute' for foods they used to eat that may have been less than ideal. For example, a person might 'substitute' a bowl of oatmeal for the danish they used to eat in the morning. The 'substitute' is supposed to be an improvement on the usual item consumed.

Here's why I don't like the term 'substitute.' It somehow implies to me that what you're eating is merely standing in for what you WANT to eat. You are will to accept something other than what you really want for whatever reason (typically because the new food is in some way a better fit with your new style of eating) but by calling it a 'substitute' you are implicitly acknowledging that item's second class status in your mind.
I agree wholeheartedly. I don't substitute foods: I choose to eat healthy, delicious real foods rather than highly processed junk. It's simple -- and oh-so-very satisfying.

Read more...

Friday, January 30, 2009

Not Your Father's Axe

By Diana Hsieh

Via Flibby, not your father's axe:



Cool! I wonder how widespread the device is.

Read more...

Talk Objectivism Needs Help

By Diana Hsieh

Jason Mosely of the podcast talkObjectivism e-mailed me the following request:

The blog for talkObjectivism.com is in need of someone to update it. I work two full-time jobs (day job and freelance) so I don't have time to do it myself.

All you would have to do is write the show notes for the shows. I can give you a login to the blog or you can just post the show notes in the Facebook group. I can copy/paste them into WordPress.

We have a lot of new listeners (300+ per week) and I think the show notes help people catch up when they first find the show.
If you're interested, contact Jason at jmosley(-AT-)talkobjectivism.com

Read more...

Ray Niles Hits Two Home Runs

By Paul Hsieh

I've just had the pleasure of reading two of Ray Niles' recent articles, one on financial regulation and one on proposed government internet regulations to guarantee "net neutrality". Both are clear and excellent applications of Objectivist principles to important and timely issues. If you have an interest in these topics (or know someone who does), these are "must reads".

His article on "net neutrality" appears in the Winter 2008-2009 issue of The Objective Standard here: "Net Neutrality: Toward a Stupid Internet".

Given the widespread prevalence of the "information wants to be free" viewpoint by libertarian tech types, it's refreshing to read a principled defense of property rights as applied to the issues of internet traffic and the "net neutrality" debate.

If you're not a subscriber, you can purchase a PDF of the entire piece for $4.95. But you really should be a subscriber, if you're not already.

His second piece is on the issue of financial regulations in the wake of the recent economic crisis. Here is his description (reproduced with his permission):

I am excited to announce that an article I wrote has been published in CFA Magazine, a magazine with global circulation of 100,000 that is published by CFA Institute, a finance professional organization. It is part of an "Agree / Disagree" set on the proposition: "The global market crisis calls for an expansion of regulatory oversight." I have permission to email it; if you want a copy, let me know and I will email it to you. Please feel free to re-distribute it, but do not post it in its entirety on the web.

In the article, I call for gold money and the abolition of regulatory agencies. I identify the need for government to recognize the right to life, liberty, and property. The editor featured the article as the magazine's cover story under a scary image that says, "Big Government Is Watching." In the print version of the magazine, a yellow banner also asks, "Is more regulation the answer to market woes?"

Here are the opening paragraphs. Later, I discuss the specific causes and solution to the crisis.
Regulation cannot be the solution to the financial crisis because it is the cause of the financial crisis. The only proper action for governments to take is to remove existing regulations, fully recognize property rights, and enforce already-existing laws against fraud and theft. Doing so will help our economy speedily recover and make future crises smaller and rarer.

In fact, the premise itself is misleading. "Regulatory oversight" implies that regulation is some form of law enforcement mechanism that protects the rights to life and property, akin to laws against robbery, murder, and fraud. But that is not the case. Such laws already exist on the books and should be enforced when mortgage lenders, for example, commit fraud. No new regulation is necessary to protect rights.

Instead of protecting rights, regulations violate them. A regulation is an action by a government body that intervenes in voluntary agreements between individuals. It prohibits -- before the fact -- entire classes of behavior, criminalizing that behavior even if it is voluntary and involves no compulsion or fraud. For example, a law such as the Community Reinvestment Act that forces lenders to give mortgage loans to borrowers that do not meet their credit standards violates the right of the lender to decide whether and to whom to lend its money.
To get the full version of the article, you can contact Ray directly at: "rayniles (at) rcniles (dot) com".

This would be a great article to distribute to friends, coworkers, your investment advisor, or anyone who lost money in the markets in the last 6 months (which is pretty much everyone in the Western World!)

Plus Ray's example highlights two important points:

1) Americans are interested in hearing our message. Many people know that there is something deeply wrong with the status quo, and at some level they recognize that Obama-style socialism is not the answer. But they don't know what the positive alternative is. We can offer them that. Americans are becoming increasingly receptive to our ideas. Hence, there is no better time to speak out.

2) Individuals can make a difference. I'll let Ray speak for himself if he wishes, but until relatively recently he did not engage in any kind of formal activism. But he has found subjects that were of great interest to him and chosen to write on those subjects to appropriate audiences.

The result has been two articles in The Objective Standard (one on energy policy now available for free and his more recent article on "net neutrality") as well as his article for CFA Magazine. This latter piece could reach many influential minds in the financial industry and give them the moral defense of the free market that they so badly need.

Ray Niles has clearly upped his game. And I thank him for it!

Read more...

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Link-O-Rama

By Diana Hsieh

  • Jason Sheehan, the food critic of the Westword, Denver's alternative weekly newspaper, savages PETA's call to rename fish to prevent people from eating them. The title says it all: PETA in the news again: "Sea Kittens" campaign making me hungry. (Via Ari Armstrong.)

  • President Bush's Cheese Wars: In retaliation for the EU banning the US's hormone-treated beef, President Bush slapped a 100 percent tariff on a variety of EU goods -- and a 300 percent tariff on roquefort cheese. What ever happened to global free trade? Yes, I know, it's hiding in the basement with other supposedly outmoded concepts like "limited government" and "fiscal responsibility." Thanks, George.

    For the record, although I prefer not to consume it, people should be able to buy and sell beef from cows treated with hormones freely. The law should only ban fraud, such as the labeling of hormone-treated beef as hormone-free. Unfortunately, that can be a genuine problem.

  • Your doctor's fine-looking white coat and your nurse's scrubs may be a serious health menace.

  • Too strange: Knitters Become Graffiti Artists. (Via Rory Hodgson.)

    Read more...
  • Objectivist Roundup

    By Diana Hsieh

    Burgess Laughlin has the latest Objectivist Roundup. Go check it out!

    Read more...

    Where's the Airsickness Bag?

    By Greg Perkins

    Really, I was ready to let it go and move on. But then this floated by in one of those endlessly-forwarded emails that friends and family pass around. What's so revolting is the utter inversion of justice it represents in the mainstream treatment of the accident.


    God is routinely given credit and thanked for saving those people; but notice that He's not similarly given "credit" for needlessly killing those geese, destroying that plane, endangering and distressing the people involved, and soaking up lots of resources to deal with it all. Nor is He reflexively given such "credit" for all the deaths that aren't averted in other plane mishaps.

    Such psychoses aside, the real problem I have with this is that it dilutes and distracts from the recognition genuinely earned by the heroes involved!

    • The pilot trained long and hard to be able to fly planes of various kinds, and to identify and execute just such a lifesaving maneuver. Then, in the moment it was needed and under tremendous stresses, he kept his head and did an absolutely brilliant job.

    • The crew trained as well in managing such a process -- and when their moment came they likewise kept their heads and executed brilliantly.

    • Engineers labored long and hard to design a plane that didn't just fly, but which would have ever better chances in all sorts of rare and strange circumstances, working to reduce the odds and impact of the unexpected. The result is a craft that could withstand this sort of water landing and float long enough to get those people out.

    • People on the ground sprang into action to scoop up the passengers and contain the danger.

    • And on and on. How about the experts who will analyze what happened and use it to make people a little safer in the future?
    These folks deserve all of the credit and admiration and thanks, and it's an absolute injustice that the mainstream reaction would take even the tiniest sliver of their due and pretend it was earned by someone or something else.

    Read more...

    Wednesday, January 28, 2009

    MRI Case Answer

    By Paul Hsieh

    Once again, here is the original image:



    Here is a magnified view of the abnormality, at the front of the knee just below the patella (kneecap):



    The patellar tendon is torn. It should be a smooth black stripe, as in the normal image:



    The patellar tendon is normally very strong. In fact, you can feel how stout your own patellar tendon is by placing your finger just below your kneecap while your knee is extended, then gently bending your knee back and forth a few degrees (i.e., 2-3 inches).

    Hence, patellar tendon ruptures are fairly rare sports injuries. Here's more information.

    Some of the other guesses were reasonable. However, I only gave one image (out of over 100), so many of the other structures of the knee were not included. For instance, the cruciate ligaments were not fully included on this one image and they happenened to be intact. But one would have required seeing the full data set to know one way or another. There probably was also some hemorrhage in the skin and fat just anterior to (in front of) the patellar tendon tear.

    If you enjoy these semi-regular radiology case presentations, please let me know. My practice is very busy, so it's easy for me to find and post interesting case examples to NoodleFood.

    Read more...

    British Gun Owners Finally Waking Up

    By Paul Hsieh

    British gun owners are finally starting to stand up for their rights, opposing the many years of failed government gun controls:



    Will these protestors make a difference? Or is it "too little, too late"?

    And will American gun owners learn the right lessons? Or will they become too complacent in the wake of the Heller Supreme Court decision?

    (Via Howard Roerig.)

    Read more...

    Tuesday, January 27, 2009

    MRI Case of the Day

    By Paul Hsieh

    Today's radiology case is another MRI study that came through my regular practice. I'll post the ansewr tomorrow.

    The patient is a 29-year old man who hurt his knee playing basketball, while jumping for a rebound. Here is the relevant MRI image. What's wrong with this picture?



    For comparison, here is an MRI image of a normal knee (from a different patient) and an anatomy diagram:





    What's your diagnosis? The answer will be posted tomorrow!

    Read more...

    The Bureaucrats are Coming! A New Madiera for the 21st Century

    By Gina Liggett

    As I have been learning in a wine certification seminar, Madeira wine, called the "Wine of the Patriots," played an important part in American colonial rebellion against the British.

    For years during the American colonial period, Madeira wine was uniquely exempted from taxation because of the British Navigation laws, and became a symbol of American rebellion against the British. When John Hancock's sloop, Liberty, was seized in Boston harbor, the stage was set for the Boston Tea Party. George Washington toasted the signing of the Declaration of Independence with Madeira, and it was used in the christening of the warship Constitution. It was also favored by the likes of Benjamin Franklin and John Adams.

    When the ordinary American colonist walked into a pub and boldly ordered a Madeira rather than a British beverage, the symbolic rebellious gesture was nothing less than piquant.

    Madeira is a fortified wine made on the Portuguese island of Madeira. It is a rich-tasting mélange of the flavors of roasted fruit, burnt oranges, espresso coffee and sugar-coated nuts, as described in the Complete Idiot's Guide to Wine Basics by Tara Q. Thomas. (I can attest to that description, having tasted some delicious Madeiras recently.)

    Sadly, there are only nine producers of Madeira left in the world, questioning its sustainability as an enduring legacy in wine making. But it's obsolescence as a symbol also raises the question of what could be our contemporary symbol of rebellion in our fight against the anti-egoism state of our culture. America is morphing every day into ever-greater states of dependency, paternalism, socialism, irrationalism and even nihilism. As Objectivists, we want to create a new American Renaissance through the power of ideas.

    The symbol of rebellion that I display in public is the mysterious and foreboding question, "Who Is John Galt?" I display that bumper sticker on my car and wear tee-shirts with that quote. One day, when someone at the gym read my tee-shirt, he looked me straight in the eye and gave me a knowing thumbs up. I felt a camaraderie with that stranger. I wonder if in some small way what I felt was the same kind of pride a colonist felt when he ordered Madeira in a bar full of British soldiers.

    I challenge other readers to suggest a new "Madeira" for today. I look forward to your suggestions! Cheers to all!

    Read more...

    Monday, January 26, 2009

    Another Condom Commercial

    By Diana Hsieh

    Thanks, Al Gore! You invented the internet, and now I can watch a condom commercial featuring condom animal balloons getting it on! (It's actually kinda cute.)

    Read more...

    Hsieh LTE in Colorado Springs Gazette

    By Paul Hsieh

    The January 22, 2009 Colorado Springs Gazette published one of my LTEs on government regulation vs. personal responsibility. It's the 5th one down:

    INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY
    Government paternalism saps desire to make own decisions


    I want to thank The Gazette for the nice discussion of individual responsibility in Monday's paper ("People responsible for safety," Our View). Too many adult Americans expect the government to treat them as if they were still children and the government was their parents.

    It's only a small step from the government telling you what kind of houses you can build to telling you what food you can eat or what books you can read.

    When citizens start asking the government do their thinking for them, it makes them easy prey for demagogues and dictators. That's why this kind of government paternalism is so dangerous.

    Paul Hsieh, Sedalia
    It was in response to their own January 16, 2009 OpEd opposing more government home safety regulations, "People responsible for safety".

    Although it's important to oppose bad ideas, it's even more important to support good ideas. I'm glad to have had this opportunity to do so.

    Read more...

    Sunday, January 25, 2009

    Recap #28

    By Diana Hsieh

    This week on Politics without God, the blog of the Coalition for Secular Government:

    This week on We Stand FIRM, the blog of FIRM: Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine:
    This week on FA/RM, the blog of Free Agriculture - Restore Markets:

    Read more...

    Sunday Open Thread #33

    By Diana Hsieh

    Here's yet another a Sunday Open Thread for your thoughts:

    For anyone in the fiery grip of a random question, comment, joke, or link they'd like to share with NoodleFood readers, I hereby open up the comments on this post to any respectable topic. (Please refrain from posting personal attacks, pornographic material, and commercial solicitations.)

    Read more...

    Saturday, January 24, 2009

    Raw Milk Cheese

    By Diana Hsieh

    Not long ago, I discovered that I could buy some raw milk cheeses in my regular grocery store. Yeah! Unfortunately, the FDA prohibits the sale of raw milk cheeses aged for less than sixty days, but at least some raw cheese can be had.

    I've tried -- and liked -- Organic Valley's raw sharp cheddar. It's good, but nothing to write home about. Basically, it's not nearly sharp enough for my tastes. I also very much enjoyed the raw cheese I bought from Colorado's own Windsor Dairy. I can't recall which one I bought, but I'd happily go out of my way to buy more from them.

    However, just this morning I tried the raw milk blue cheese made by Point Reyes in California. I bought it from my local Safeway yesterday. It was pungent, smooth, creamy perfection. Apparently, I'm not the only one in love with it.

    So if you like blue cheese, give it a try! It wasn't particularly expensive, relative to other good-quality cheeses. At $20 per pound, my good-sized hunk of .37 pounds cost $7.40.

    Read more...

    Pantry Cleanout

    By Diana Hsieh

    Unlike some people, I didn't clean out my pantry when I first adopted my diet of real, whole foods. In part, that's because I eased into that diet gradually over the course of a few weeks from late June to early July. After that, it was simply not a problem worth fixing right away. I wasn't tempted to eat the junk still left in my pantry, and I've had little time to do home projects like that while I've been writing my dissertation.

    Last Sunday, I finally did the deed. Mostly, it was a matter of good timing. I was on break from work. I had a bunch of large and sturdy bags because I just bought six 50-pound bags of horse feed. And Paul was going to haul out the trash that night for pickup on Monday.

    I was pretty surprised by how much I had to throw out: three and a half full and heavy bags. I threw out many boxes of pasta, bags of stuffing, vegetable shortening, cans of Campbell's soup, boxes of mac and cheese, angel food cake mix, fruit leathers, granola bars, crystal light mix, cream of wheat, grits, corn meal, dry milk, rye flour, wheat gluten, whole wheat flour, onion soup mix, all kinds of rice, rice noodles, splenda, corn syrup, brown sugars, juice, spray canola oil, and more.

    I did keep my white sugar. Although I don't use it at all, I might want it for company. I also kept my white flour, in case I need to make a roux. (I wasn't happy with the roux made from spouted flour; it browned too quickly. I should try it again, however, perhaps at a lower temperature.) Plus, I do still need to make brownies for FROG meetings, and that requires adding a bit of flour to the Ghirardelli mix to compensate for our high altitude. (I wonder what kind of oil I should use for those: maybe cold-pressed walnut oil?)

    In the clean-out process, I was amazed to read the ingredient list on my Campbell's tomato soups: sugar and flour are high on the list. (Presumably, flour is used as a thickener.) The major ingredients in their Tomato Soup are "Tomato Puree (Water, Tomato Paste), High Fructose Corn Syrup, Wheat Flour." And for Tomato Bisque, they are "Tomato Puree (Water, Tomato Paste), Diced Tomatoes in Tomato Juice, Sugar, Wheat Flour, Cream, (Milk), Water." UGH! No thanks!

    Now I have so much more room in my pantry. Yeah!

    Read more...

    Friday, January 23, 2009

    Set the Market Free

    By Diana Hsieh

    An announcement from the Ayn Rand Center:

    Set the Market Free: The Cure for the Financial Crisis A talk at American University

    Who: Yaron Brook, executive director of the Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights

    What: A talk arguing that the financial crisis was caused by the government and can only be cured by the free market. An open Q&A will follow. A Q&A will follow.

    Where: Mary Graydon Center Building, Room 3. 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20016.

    When: Wednesday, January 28, 2009, at 7 pm.

    Description: Virtually everyone today regards the financial crisis as a failure of the free market. In this talk, Yaron Brook, executive director of the Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights, will argue that in fact it is the un-free market that has failed. It was not capitalism that held interest rates below the rate of inflation, spurring massive amounts of borrowing and a housing boom. It was not capitalism that gave us Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which promoted subprime lending and helped fuel the boom. It was not capitalism that gave us deposit insurance and the "too big to fail" doctrine, which encouraged risky financial practices. These, and many anti-capitalist measures like them, Dr. Brook will argue, laid the groundwork for the financial crisis. The only cure, according to Dr. Brook, is to set the market free. But to do that, Americans must embrace capitalism as a moral system--one that should be defended without guilt.

    Admission: FREE. Open to students and the public

    Bio: Dr. Yaron Brook is president and executive director of the Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights and a contributing editor of "The Objective Standard." A former finance professor, he has been published in academic as well as popular publications, and his opinion-editorials appear in major newspapers. He is frequently interviewed on national TV and radio. Dr. Brook lectures on Objectivism, business ethics and foreign policy at college campuses, community groups and corporations across America and throughout the world.

    Read more...

    Pachabel Hell

    By Diana Hsieh

    Funny yet musically instructive:



    If you liked that one, try:



    Via Amy Mossoff

    Read more...

    Activism: Time to Up Your Game?

    By Diana Hsieh

    I posted the following message to my OActivists e-mail list after Paul's first national op-ed -- Universal healthcare and the waistline police -- was picked up by Yahoo News and listed as the most-read op-ed all day. I thought NoodleFood readers might be interested too.

    Two years ago, Paul had zero experience in activism. So how did he get from zero to sixty? As someone who saw the process up close, I'd mention a few points:

  • His two years of regular blogging on health care at the FIRM blog gives him an important base of knowledge from which to write. He doesn't just rely on his knowledge of Objectivism.

  • He developed his skills of writing letters and op-eds in our local Colorado papers. He wrote and published a great deal for those markets before seriously attempting to publish in national-level papers.

  • He has been very willing to allow others to edit his work. He endured some very brutal criticism from me and others on occasion. He's very conscious of his writing, so he doesn't make the same mistakes twice.

  • He treats newspaper editors with respect, rather than like punching bags. The opinion editors for the major Colorado newspapers know who he is -- and they're often receptive to getting another submission from him.

  • He's always on the lookout for a new idea or angle to turn into an op-ed. We routinely discuss the best ways of answering some argument or presenting some point. He works on making his writings ever more engaging, interesting, and clear.

  • Most of all, he writes and writes and writes -- just as Yaron Brook urged us to do at OCON 2008. He does that in his spare time, despite an exceedingly busy work schedule -- and he enjoys it.

    So here's a challenge: What are you going to do to up your game in 2009?
  • Read more...

    Thursday, January 22, 2009

    Medical History Of The Day

    By Paul Hsieh

    This is from the radiology order sheet at my workplace:

    FELL 10 DAYS AGO ON TILE FLOOR IN COSTA RICA AFTER A COATI (MAMMAL TYPE RACCOON) URINATED ON THE FLOOR --- PATIENT HAVING PERSISTENT HEAD AND NECK PAIN
    I'm sure someone enjoyed typing that in!

    Read more...

    Miracle on the Hudson

    By Greg Perkins


    [HT: PZ Meyers]

    Read more...

    Objectivist Roundup

    By Diana Hsieh

    Nick Provenzo has the latest Objectivist Roundup. Go check it out!

    Read more...

    Hot Damn!

    By Diana Hsieh

    [Originally posted to Politics without God.]

    Eugene Volokh reports that South Carolina state senator Robert Ford -- a Democrat -- proposes a bill against "dirty" language, including the following provisions:

    It is unlawful for a person in a public forum or place of public accommodation wilfully and knowingly to publish orally or in writing, exhibit, or otherwise make available material containing words, language, or actions of a profane, vulgar, lewd, lascivious, or indecent nature.
    And:
    It is unlawful for a person to disseminate profanity to a minor if he wilfully and knowingly publishes orally or in writing, exhibits, or otherwise makes available material containing words, language, or actions of profane, vulgar, lewd, lascivious, or indecent nature.
    Violating either provision would be a felony -- with the potential for five years in prison: "a person who violates [either provision] is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than five thousand dollars or imprisoned not more than five years, or both."

    Ah well, at least the Bible would be banned along with Atlas Shrugged -- and almost everything else, including swearing within earshot of your 17-year-old kid.

    The bill is currently in committee. While I'm sure it won't go anywhere, the fact that such legislation could even be proposed in 21st century America is mind-boggling.

    Read more...

    Wednesday, January 21, 2009

    Link-O-Rama

    By Diana Hsieh

  • Alex Epstein's radio interview on Atlas Shrugged and the financial crisis.

  • StrategyPage on torture. Interesting.

  • Wow. Circuit City is going out of business.

  • Eric Daniels' OCON 2008 course on Freedom of Speech in American History and Lin Zinser's Intellectual Activism: A Case Study in Health-Care Activism are now available from the Ayn Rand Bookstore.

  • Heh: Flowchart of Heavy Metal Band Names.

    Read more...
  • Good Things

    By Diana Hsieh

    I've decided to use Twitter to post at least one good thing that I make happen each day.

    I got the idea from Amy Mossoff, who got it from Jean Moroney, who got it from the big kahuna of positive psychology Marty Seligman. Here's what Jean Moroney wrote about it:

    Once each day, write down three good things that happened in the last 24 hours. You can write them before going to bed or first thing in the morning. You can write them in a journal or in a calendar or on a Post-it. You can include important achievements such as winning a contract or simple pleasures such as eating a good meal. All that matters is that you write down three such items, every day.

    As you can guess, the purpose of this practice is to reinforce a positive outlook and avoid feeling overwhelmed by negativity. Even on the worst of days there are a few bright spots, and bringing them to mind helps you maintain perspective.

    Dr. Seligman ran controlled experiments to test the technique. Not only did his subjects report being happier and more optimistic during the studies, but they liked participating so much that they continued writing down three good things each day after the experiment was over.

    This little bit of thinking each day has large emotional rewards. Why? Because it strengthens two kinds of value judgments:

    1) What you hold as good: Every time you decide consciously that something is good, you reinforce, clarify, and concretize what "good" means.

    2) What you hold as important: Important means "entitled to attention or consideration." When you spend a little time focusing on the good in your life, you are implicitly asserting that the good is what's important.

    Not bad for three minutes of thinking each day.
    I don't tend to be a pessimistic person. In fact, I'm pretty thoroughly convinced that my life is just damn awesome. (That's one reason why Kate's death hit me so hard: I'm very used to my life being fantastic.) However, I would like to highlight some of the particularly bright spots in my days: I like having a record of what I've done, and what I found particularly noteworthy about it. So using Twitter will be my variant on the "Three Good Things" method.

    You can read my Good Things by following me or subscribing to my RSS feed.

    Oh, and Greg Perkins is now posting his Good Things on Twitter too! Yeah! It's a Twitter revolution! Stop griping and start good-thing-ing! You can follow Greg or subscribe to his RSS feed.

    If you want to get more good advice from Jean Moroney, I recommend subscribing to her newsletter.

    Update: As per Bill Brown's suggestion in the comments, you might want to use the hash tag "#GoodThing" because then you'll show up in the search for everyone twittering Good Things.

    Read more...

    Tuesday, January 20, 2009

    Onomatopoeia "Live in 3-D", January 30

    By Greg Perkins

    (Yes, that's me with the sax, and several of me in the audience, too. :^)

    It's time for our huge annual Onomatopoeia concert in the Egyptian Theatre, and as usual, this year's show will be more spectacular than ever! We'll be featuring brand new works and favorites from our three critically acclaimed CDs, and we'll have a string orchestra filling out our wall-o-sound. PLUS there will be the additional entertainment of the occasional Camera Guy in Black scurrying by to get the perfect shot for broadcast TV!

    The band is heavy in preparation and the new music is a serious kick in the pants, so if you're somewhere near the Boise area at the end of the month you won't want to miss this one!

    WHAT: Kevin Kirk & Onomatopoeia "Live in 3-D" (with Strings attached)
    WHEN: January 30, 7:30pm
    WHERE: Historic Egyptian Theatre, downtown Boise
    TICKETS: Reserved seating only, $25, purchased online at this link
    INFO: Please phone 208-345-9116 for more information, or visit www.kevinkirk.net

    Hope to see you there!

    Read more...

    Good Riddance

    By Diana Hsieh

    The Economist savages George W. Bush's eight years as president. It's an interesting survey, even though the praise and criticism is often misplaced. Here's what I found most interesting:

    Lack of curiosity also led Mr Bush to suspect intellectuals in general and academic experts in particular. David Frum, who wrote speeches for Mr Bush during his first term, noted that "conspicuous intelligence seemed actively unwelcome in the Bush White House". The Bush cabinet was "solid and reliable", but contained no "really high-powered brains". Karen Hughes, one of his closest advisers, "rarely read books and distrusted people who did". Ron Suskind, a journalist, has argued that Mr Bush created a "faith-based presidency" in which decisions, precisely because they were based on faith, could not be revised subsequently.
    Now onward -- and likely downward -- to Barack Obama.

    Read more...

    Circumcision as Mutilation

    By Diana Hsieh

    I've been catching up on my listening of Dr. Peikoff's excellent podcasts (available via iTunes) over the past few weeks. I have been enjoying them immensely -- although I definitely prefer his solo podcasts to the group discussions. The questions have become increasingly interesting, and his answers are often a bit surprising. I don't always agree with him fully, and I find our minor disagreements of great interest. All in all, I think these podcasts are a fantastic contribution our understanding of Objectivism -- particularly its application to the ordinary problems of daily life. So if you're not listening to them, you're missing out!

    A few weeks ago, my ears perked up in his discussion of circumcision in Podcast #34. I am adamantly opposed to that practice -- on the grounds that it inhibits a man's natural potential for sexual pleasure. Admittedly, I was a bit petrified to hear what Dr. Peikoff might say. (What if he didn't think it was a big deal?!? Yikes!) But I need not have worried: he knows his stuff. Here's the transcription, courtesy of Flibby:

    Question: Medical issues aside, what right does a parent have to alter a child's body? On one end of the spectrum, I could imagine a parent wanting to remove an abnormal but benign growth, say, a sixth, non-functioning finger. On the other end of the spectrum is circumcision, which I regard as mutilation.:

    Peikoff: By the way, I agree with that 100 percent. There can be no legitimate reason for anyone to circumcise a boy. It's either primitive religion, abject conformity, or the evil of destructiveness. Now this question goes on.

    Question: Aside from from those two extremes of the sixth finger and circumcision, somewhere in the middle of the spectrum are things like ear-piercing on which I am undecided.

    Peikoff: Now, my view would be this: If there is no violation of the biologically normal, then a parent may make changes. He may make changes in that which is abnormal or that which is required by the health. For instance, I do not think parents should have the right to withhold blood in the case of a child who is going to sicken and die for lack of a transfusion. That should be absolutely mandatory on similar grounds on what I said on the further question. But aside from this, I think anything else that would be permanent should be left to the child once he's 18, forbidden by the parent until he's 18. For instance, even piercing ears to wear earrings, piercing the tongue, having indelible tattoos -- all of that I think should be prohibited by a parent and impermissible to a parent to do when the child is their ward and doesn't know well enough what to do.

    So that's a pretty old-fashioned view but that's definitely my view.
    I was allowed to get my ears pierced after I graduated from 8th grade. That seemed way too late to me at the time, but in retrospect, I'm glad that I was mature enough to make my own decision and to care for the wound as required. (A friend of mine who got her ears pierced some years before me was so grossed out that she couldn't touch them.) I don't think that was problematic -- but only because ear piecing is such a small thing, without any negative implications for a girl's life. I wouldn't say the same about a tattoo, piercing another area of the body, or a boy piercing his ears. I think those should be forbidden by the parents while their child is still a child.

    What say you?

    Read more...

    Monday, January 19, 2009

    John Lewis to Speak in Fort Collins

    By Diana Hsieh

    Joe Collins -- a teacher at Ridgeview Classical Schools -- invites you dinner and a lecture by Objectivist historian on "Love and War in the Early Greek Poets" in Fort Collins on Friday, January 30th.

    Here's the announcement from Joe Collins:
    John David Lewis, visiting professor of political science at Duke University, will be in Fort Collins Friday, January 30 to give an opening address for the fifth annual Young Aristotle Competition. The talk is entitled "Love and War in the Early Greek Poets." Here is a synopsis of the talk:

    "Long before the development of philosophy as a field of study, the Greeks asked questions about the world we live in. What is it that ties all things together, and that also leads to so much conflict? Many thought that there were two forces in the world: Love, and Strife. This lecture will consider some of the earliest thoughts on these forces, both by philosophers and by poets, and will ask how their ideas can help us to understand the world we live in today."

    Dr. Lewis holds a PhD in Classics from the University of Cambridge, and an Anthem Fellowship for Objectivist Scholarship. He is a senior research scholar in history and classics at the Social Philosophy and Policy Center, Bowling Green State University. His books are "Solon the Thinker: Political Thought in Archaic Athens" (Duckworth, 2006), and "Early Greek Lawgivers" (Bristol Classical Press, 2007). His book "Nothing Less Than Victory: The Will to Fight and the Lessons of History" is in press with Princeton University Press.

    We invite you to an evening of intellectual inquiry and academic scholarship. Tickets for the dinner and lecture are only $9.00, proceeds paying for the event. Contact Joe Collins jcollins(AT)ridgeviewclassical.com to reserve your tickets. Should you not be able to attend and yet would like to support Objectivist speakers, and the schools and teachers who incorporate them in education, feel free to make a contribution.
    I'll be there!

    Read more...

    Today's Logic Quiz

    By Paul Hsieh

    This is a cute logic quiz, provided that you understand it's a test of whether you can accurately assess the validity of an argument form within a purely deductive (as opposed to inductive) reasoning context.

    Hence, it is a bit artificial, given that regular everyday thinking requires a constant interplay between deductive and inductive reasoning.

    (Via BBspot.)

    Read more...

    OCON Registration

    By Diana Hsieh

    A few days ago, Paul and I registered for OCON -- the Ayn Rand Institute's summer conference -- in order to take advantage of the discount for registering before February 1st.

    As for the general sessions, I'm particularly eager to hear Tara Smiths two lectures, No Tributes to Caesar: Good or Evil in Atlas Shrugged and "Humanity's Darkest Evil:" The Lethal Destructiveness of Non-Objective Law, John Allison on Principled Leadership, and Onkar Ghate on The Separation of Church and State.

    As for the optional courses, Paul and I registered for the following:

    Session One:

    1. A: Eric Daniels: Religion in American History

    2. B: Yaron Brook: The Moral Defense of Capitalism: A History
    Session Two:
    1. A: Craig Biddle: Moral Rights and Metaphysical Law

    2. B: Pat Corvini: Limits and the Universality of Mathematics
    I really wish we could also take John Lewis' course The History of Ancient Greece: The Archaic Period, but we're otherwise booked in the "B Block." So we'll definitely order that one on CD.

    As for the other events, Paul and I will be attending the opening banquet but not the closing banquet. We always go out to a fine dinner with friends instead of the closing banquet. We never much enjoy the random good-byes, the overly loud music, and the overpriced food of the closing banquet. Unfortunately, some of our usual friends will be otherwise occupied or absent from OCON. So, friends, if you'd be interested in dining with us on that July 11th, just drop me an e-mail sometime in the next few months.

    Read more...

    Sunday, January 18, 2009

    Recap #27

    By Diana Hsieh

    This week on Politics without God, the blog of the Coalition for Secular Government:

    This week on We Stand FIRM, the blog of FIRM: Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine:
    This week on FA/RM, the blog of Free Agriculture - Restore Markets:

    Read more...

    Sunday Open Thread #32

    By Diana Hsieh

    Here's yet another a Sunday Open Thread for your thoughts:

    For anyone in the fiery grip of a random question, comment, joke, or link they'd like to share with NoodleFood readers, I hereby open up the comments on this post to any respectable topic. (Please refrain from posting personal attacks, pornographic material, and commercial solicitations.)

    Read more...

    Saturday, January 17, 2009

    Fat Loss Update

    By Diana Hsieh

    This morning, I hit one of those "fitting into clothes" milestones in my weight loss. Here's the background:

    I've lost just over fifteen pounds since OCON in July 2008 due to my cavewoman diet of meat, veggies, dairy, and some fruit. (Yeah me!) I was 150 pounds in mid-July, and now I'm at 134 pounds. I have four more pounds of fat that I'd like to lose, and then I'm going to shift my focus to gaining muscle. (I found that I had to back off on my uber-intense weightlifting to lose fat; I've kept my existing muscle as I lost weight, but I'd like to put on more muscle. I like being strong; it's darn useful.) I'm 5'8" tall, so 130 pounds is a good target weight.

    I'm really thrilled with my weight loss. I've been battling my slowly-growing layer of fat since 2004. For four long years, I exercised daily: I did the standard regimen of 40 to 60 minutes of cardio. I attempted to eat "healthier," mostly meaning less fat, less calories. I was often ravenously hungry; I often felt deprived; I desperately craved sugar. Worst of all, despite some occasional success, my weight continued to creep upwards. I felt like I had no control.

    In June of 2008, I decided to try eliminating processed foods from my diet. I liked that. So in mid-July, I began my cavewoman diet in earnest. As already noted, I've shed fifteen pounds in six months -- without much effort and without feeling deprived. I can happily eat this diet for years to come.

    I'm really, really happy with how I look now. As one would expect, my clothes have gotten looser, particularly my pants. So this morning, I tried on some jeans that I bought a few years ago, probably when I was between 140 and 145. These jeans never really fit. When I bought them, I had lost a bit of weight, and I was hoping to lose more. Instead, I gained weight again, such that I couldn't possibly fit into these jeans. So they were shelved. Today, I wore them. Best of all, they're not tight at all. If anything, they're a bit loose. Yeah me!

    Unfortunately, I don't have anything like the pictures that Greg has of his progress. However, I do have three pictures of just my face from 2008 that show my progress.

    First, March 15th. I was 150 pounds, eating a "healthy" version of the standard American diet.



    Second, July 4th. I was probably about 149 pounds, but I had been eating more whole, real foods for a few weeks, meaning more fat and less carbs. Even though I'm the same weight as in the March picture, my face doesn't look nearly so puffy.



    Third, December 25th. I was 136 pounds. (You can blame Paul for the cruddy picture.)



    The contrast is all the more striking side-by-side:



    (Click for the full-sized image.)

    All in all, I'm not just pleased. I'm thrilled. Go me!

    Read more...

    Hunger and Real Food

    By Diana Hsieh

    Richard of Free the Animal nails the issue with this post on hunger and weight loss. I'm reproducing the whole thing here, with his permission:

    The longer I go down this path of paleo-like eating, the more I am convinced that hunger is the key. I tell people, now: ultimately, this is not a battle of the bulge, fat, or weight. This is a battle over hunger and ultimately, your hunger is going to win in the long run unless you simply have the rare constitution to be miserable all the time -- like many of the calorie restriction folks do.

    Fortunately, there is a solution, and that solution is to eat a natural diet of plenty of meats, fish, natural fats (animal, coconut, olive), vegetables, fruits (moderation), and nuts (moderation too). I think that the reason so many Atkins dieters ultimately plateau, stall, fail and put weight back on is that they have the wrong focus: low carb. Now, a natural diet is almost always going to be low carb unless you opt to have starchy tubers play a big role in your diet. But so often I see those who focus on low carbohydrate eat way too much processed junk (just like many vegetarians, now), much of it chock full of anti-food like unfermented soy protein, soy oil, and other heavily processed and refined "vegetable" oils. And, because it's low carb, people eat in unrestricted amounts, they tend to eat a lot of favorite junk (like diet sodas and protein bars), and they are not getting the proper nutrition.

    What I and others have found is that over time on this sort of diet (paleo), keeping cheating to a minimum, your hunger alters radically. At this point in my progress, it's difficult to imagine failure and regression. Why? Because I simply have no hunger for crap, anymore. Yea, I might take in a slice of pizza, now and then (can't even remember the last time, however), or a burger, but I quickly realize that I'm satisfied after only a few bites. Moreover, it can have negatives effects that turn you back the other way. During the holidays, I partook of three cookies after an evening meal of real food. Where prior to that I felt wonderfully satisfied, the whatever in the cookies made me feel uncomfortably full (now an unfamiliar feeling) for a couple of hours. Yuk.

    And as far as the daily paleo eating goes, I often have to motivate myself to eat, because I simply don't get hungry at "mealtimes," anymore. Some days I'm hungry by 9 am, and some, not until 1 in the afternoon. I might be hungry for dinner at 6, but sometimes not until 9 or 10, and sometimes not at all, which is a good time to take in a fast. When I say not hungry, what I mean is that I have no desire to eat anything at all. Food doesn't even occupy my thoughts in the slightest.

    I also think that if you've been eating paleo for at least a few months and you haven't seen noticeable changes in appetite and hunger, then maybe you need to do some fasting, twice per week, 24-30 hours each. It seems counter-intuitive, and I don't know enough to say what sorts of hormonal changes might be taking place, but I think forcing hunger intermittently plays a big role in reseting your whole hunger mechanism to a more natural state.
    All of that largely matches my own experience. I see only two points of contrast: (1) My fasts have tended to be around 20 hours. Lately, I've felt like I might be able to go longer, but other plans interfered. (2) I do eat raw dairy in various forms. However, I have to be careful about the amount of milk I drink, as that definitely slows down or even stops weight loss for me.

    Certainly, eating whole, real foods has been an integral part of my deep satisfaction with my new way of eating. While I'm no longer eating many foods that I used to eat, that's not a sacrifice: they no longer appeal to me.

    I cook dinner more often -- basically every night, rather than just a few times a week. That's because I can now whip up a fantastic meal of meat and veggies in 20 to 30 minutes without any trouble at all. Because my tastes have changed, I also eat a wider variety of vegetables than I used to, including brussel sprouts, celery (braised), broccoli, and cauliflower. Purely on taste, I'll take brussel spouts braised in a cup of cream any day over pasta.

    Sure, Paul and I spend a bit more for our raw milk, local farm eggs, and high quality meats. However, we've also saved a huge amount of money by eating out less often. I can quickly cook a meal at home that tastes as good -- or rather, usually much better -- than the food in a high-quality restaurant. Plus, if I cook the food myself, then I know exactly what I'm eating. And I don't have to fight with kindly waiters attempting to serve me bread.

    Of course, it's much cheaper to eat at home, so doing that saves money. Ultimately, I'd rather enjoy a quiet, cheap, and delicious meal of my own making than spend the week's grocery money in a single night. So now we save our eating out for special occasions at truly stellar restaurants. Plus, because my cooking has become more simple and regular, I find that I waste far less food due to spoilage. That's another savings.

    One note before I sign off: If you're interested in my health and diet blogging, I definitely recommend reading Free the Animal regularly. He's producing clear, helpful posts on a daily basis. His advice on fasting and exercise even helped Monica start to lose weight again. Yeah!

    Read more...

    Friday, January 16, 2009

    Modern Economics

    By Paul Hsieh

    Calvin and Hobbes offers some economic lessons for the modern era (click on the image to see it full size):



    (Via Maximizing Progress.)

    Read more...

    Link-O-Rama

    By Diana Hsieh

  • Could you imagine spending 13 years in jail without any kind of trial or criminal charges because some judge thinks you have money hidden away somewhere in a divorce proceeding? Probably not -- but that's what has happened to H. Beatty Chadwick, a former Philadelphia-area lawyer, thanks to one judge's application of the "murky legal concept" of civil contempt.

  • Kendall blogs about distortions due to subsidies and protectionism in domestic corn production. It begins:
    When discussing government intervention in the economy, many times we see industries where government's role is primarily one of suppression of an industry. That is, regulation, taxation, and trade restrictions serve to depress an entire industry. This is true in my industry, the chemical industry. It is also true in the pharmaceutical industry. While there may be differences in impact from firm to firm, generally all firms suffer from government intervention, and generally all firms can be viewed in some ways as victims of government intervention.

    But what happens in an industry when government subsidizes a particular set of players at the expense of another? Are all firms victims? No, The picture it turns out is very different.
    Go read the whole thing!

  • The religious want America to be more like China. After all, at least China bans porn. (Oh, that pesky notion of freedom of speech!)

  • Twincredibles: A mixed-raced couple has two sets of mismatched twins. Cool! (Via John Enright)

  • Ayn Rand for Treasury Secretary on Yahoo Finance. Ayn Rand's "fix" for today's economic crisis would involve much more than abolishing the income tax. It would entail a full return to laissez-faire capitalism. (Via Adam Buker.)

    Read more...
  • Impact via the Web

    By Diana Hsieh

    Here's a nice bit of news from the Ayn Rand Institute:

    Ayn Rand Institute Now Offering Impact Newsletter Free on the Web

    The Ayn Rand Institute is pleased to announce that its Impact newsletter is now available electronically to Web visitors. Beginning with the January 2009 issue, ARI's Web site will now offer all of its Impact issues online as PDF documents.

    Impact, which remains available in a print edition for ARI donors of $35 or more each year, delivers the latest news and progress reports on ARI's programs, along with interviews of Objectivist intellectuals and monthly highlights of different aspects of Ayn Rand's philosophy.

    The new, free electronic format will serve as an excellent way of introducing newcomers to ARI's goals and programs. Additionally, visitors may now view a three-part introductory video on ARI's home page, which provides information about Ayn Rand, Objectivism, and the Ayn Rand Institute.
    For that video, go to the main page of the Ayn Rand Institute and scroll all the way down. (Unfortunately, no direct link seems to be available.)

    Read more...

    Thursday, January 15, 2009

    Walking Cultural Activism: A Personal Relationship

    By Greg Perkins

    Tammy and I thought it would be great to produce a series of T-shirt designs for those occasions when it is appropriate to wear our ideas on our sleeves. Bonus points if they aren't just provocative but actually spark some good engagement!


    Here's a design that offers a simple, wry response to the oddly-fashionable notion that Christianity isn't a religion (no sir, it's a relationship with Jesus): I have a personal relationship with reality.



    You can't tell at that resolution, but the font sports a distressed typewriter look, and there is a subtle emphasis on the word 'reality'. Here's a closer look:



    (Just click through to BoltOfReason.Com to check out all the available styles and colors. We of course love suggestions and requests -- we're already working on a lot of fun ideas, and if you are the first to hit us with a new one that we use in a future shirt design, you'll get one for free!)

    Read more...

    Objectivist Roundup

    By Diana Hsieh

    Titanic Deck Chairs has the latest Objectivist Roundup. Go check it out!

    Read more...

    Scientology, Seizures, and Science ???

    By Diana Hsieh

    Ed Hudgins of The Atlas Society recently published a new op-ed. In the midst of a major financial crisis, not to mention the upcoming change in administration to the frighteningly mystic-altruist-collectivist Barack Obama, Mr. Hudgins decided to focus on a very, very important issue. Can you guess? Oh, I'm sure you never will.

    It's ripped from the tabloids! Entitled Scientology, Seizures, and Science, it uses the death of John Travolta's 16-year-old son from a seizure as a pretext to attack Scientology. So it's not just focused on a culturally insignificant religious fringe, but it's also in poor taste.

    Bravo, TAS! Every time I think you've hit bottom, you outdo yourself with another inanity!

    Honestly, I just can't figure out why any person who even kinda sorta likes Atlas Shrugged could find this organization worthy of financial support. They're a joke.

    Read more...

    Wednesday, January 14, 2009

    Blogger Is Confused

    By Diana Hsieh

    Blogger is very confused right now: it's periodically republishing my blog with old material from December every few hours. (It's like some server has the wrong date, and it's moving forward it time at like five times normal speed.) To make it right, I have to manually re-publish a recent post.

    I have no idea what the problem is, but I do hope that Blogger's programmer peopleguys fix it right quick tomorrow morning. In the meantime, enjoy those old posts!

    Read more...

    Explaining Mystery of the First Down Yellow Line

    By Diana Hsieh

    Wow, the technology of the first down yellow line in football is even more cool than I ever imagined!

    Sports Videos, News, Blogs

    Read more...

    Give Back, Schmive Schmack

    By Diana Hsieh

    Here's an interesting even if year-old tidbit, sent to me by William Stoddard. A list of words that ought to be banished in 2008 includes the following:

    GIVE BACK – "This oleaginous phrase is an emergency submission to the 2008 list. The notion has arisen that as one's life progresses, one accumulates a sort of deficit balance with society which must be neutralized by charitable works or financial outlays. Are one's daily transactions throughout life a form of theft?" – Richard Ong, Carthage, Missouri.

    "Various media have been featuring a large number of people who 'just want to give back.' Give back to whom? For what?" – Curtis Cooper, Hazel Park, Michigan.
    The suggestions for 2009 are have already been posted. They include this gem:
    CARBON FOOTPRINT or CARBON OFFSETTING – "It is now considered fashionable for everyone, tree hugger or lumberjack alike, to pay money to questionable companies to 'offset' their own 'carbon footprint.' What a scam! Get rid of it immediately!" Ginger Hunt, London, England.

    Mike of Chicago says that when he hears the phrase 'carbon footprint,' "I envision microscopic impressions on the surface of the earth where an atom of carbon forgot to wear its shoes."

    Christy Loop of Woodbridge, Va., says that 'leaving a carbon footprint' has become the new 'politically incorrect.' "How can we not, in one way or another, affect our natural environment?"
    Exactly!

    Read more...

    Tuesday, January 13, 2009

    How Not to Pull Your Car Out of the Snow

    By Diana Hsieh

    Via Robb, how not to pull your car out of the snow:



    And, via The Volokh Conspiracy, how not to protest a traffic ticket:

    Read more...

    Link-O-Rama

    By Diana Hsieh

  • HAHAHA! This review of The Secret is one of the funniest things I've read in a long time. [Update: Link updated because Amazon must have removed it.]

  • Keith Lockitch's recent Washington Times op-ed Environmental Angst is really, really excellent. It's one you might want to pass around to friends.

  • Richard Watts published a good letter to the editor in the Rocky Mountain News in defense of capitalism. Great job, Richard!

  • Rational Jenn has a fascinating (and long) post on the method of positive discipline she uses with her kids. I like it! [Update: She just posted on Positive Discipline And Rational Self-Interest. I'm still liking it!]

    Read more...
  • LTE About Obama's Choice for Advisor on Science & Technology

    By Gina Liggett

    My following LTE was published in the Rocky Mountain News on January 6th. I responded to the Rocky's fairly good Editorial concerning Obama's pick of a humanity-causes-global-warming alarmist to head the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.

    Dear Editor(s),

    I agree with the Rocky's Dec. 27 editorial "The limits of science/Does Obama advisor respect them?" about President-elect Obama's choice of Stephen Holdren to lead the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. But I might suggest a different title: "The limits of politics." Because that's what Obama's all about.

    Besides lack of any executive experience, he has never actually created wealth in our economy, but only spent someone else's. And now Obama has selected greenhouse-gas alarmist Holdren who joins the chorus of politicos in blaming global warming on industrialization, and who advocates severe strangulations on our economy as the answer.

    Unlike Holdren, there are many scientists who attribute global warming primarily to the formidible forces of nature that have caused drastic climate change in Earth's past. There is a great deal of scientific debate that has become squashed because of politics.

    But despite Obama's hot air about "free and open inquiry," it's clear by his choice of Holdren that he doesn't care about facts, science or economics, but the world he knows best--politics.

    Gina Liggett, Denver

    Read more...

    Monday, January 12, 2009

    Chicken Chicken Chicken

    By Diana Hsieh

    If I keep on this roll of chicken humor, I'm going to have to create a separate category for it. Here's the latest, courtesy of Larry Salzman in the comments:



    I love the Q&A!

    Prior chicken-related humor includes Chicken Law and Order and Muppet Chickens Sing Blue Danube.

    Read more...

    Washington Examiner Quotes Me On Health Care

    By Paul Hsieh

    The January 11, 2009 Washington Examiner has quoted me in their editorial on the dangers of universal health care. Here is the opening:

    Universal coverage? First, look at the disaster in Massachusetts
    By Examiner Editorial -- 1/11/09

    To much fanfare from both right and left in 2006, Massachusetts became the first state in the nation to require all residents to buy health insurance. A new state health insurance clearinghouse was created, with taxpayers subsidizing those who couldn't afford to buy coverage. Then Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican, promised that "every uninsured citizen in Massachusetts will soon have affordable health insurance." Yet just two years later, Romney's much-heralded "solution" -- touted by many as the model for a national program -- has become an embarrassing flop.

    Just a year after the universal coverage law passed, The New York Times reported, state insurers were already jacking up rates to twice the national average. According to Dr. Paul Hsieh, a physician and founding member of Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine, 43 mandatory benefits -- including those that many people did not want or need, such as in vitro fertilization -- raised the costs of coverage for Massachusetts residents by as much as 56 percent, depending upon an individual's income status. So much for "affordable" health care...
    Read the rest here.

    Their OpEd quoted extensively from my article in the Fall 2008 issue of The Objective Standard, "Mandatory Health Insurance: Wrong for Massachusetts, Wrong for America".

    I'm deeply grateful to the Examiner for publicizing this issue and to Craig Biddle for encouraging me to write the original article.

    Update: The OpEd also appeared in the San Francisco Examiner. So it may be getting a fairly wide circulation!

    Read more...

    Sunday, January 11, 2009

    Recap #26

    By Diana Hsieh

    This week on Politics without God, the blog of the Coalition for Secular Government:

    This week on We Stand FIRM, the blog of FIRM: Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine:
    This week on FA/RM, the blog of Free Agriculture - Restore Markets:

    Read more...

    Sunday Open Thread #31

    By Diana Hsieh

    Here's yet another a Sunday Open Thread for your thoughts:

    For anyone in the fiery grip of a random question, comment, joke, or link they'd like to share with NoodleFood readers, I hereby open up the comments on this post to any respectable topic. (Please refrain from posting personal attacks, pornographic material, and commercial solicitations.)

    Read more...

    Saturday, January 10, 2009

    Rand Discussion on Secular Right Blog

    By Paul Hsieh

    The conservative blog Secular Right has started an open thread on Ayn Rand. Some of the contributors to this blog include high-profile conservative intellectuals such as Heather Mac Donald, John Derbyshire, Walter Olson, and Razib Khan who are sympathetic to secular ideals. Hence, this is an excellent opportunity for Objectivists to leave thoughtful, polite comments supporting Rand's ideas.

    Here's the comment I left:

    Ayn Rand's greatest contribution to the realm of political philosophy was her explicit moral defense of capitalism. Too many defenders of capitalism on the political right are lukewarm on capitalism. They argue that it "works" (in the sense of delivering material prosperity), but regard the essential element of capitalism (the pursuit of one’s self-interest) as morally suspect. For instance, Irving Kristol only gives capitalism "two cheers" in his famous book by the same title because he regards capitalism as lacking an essential moral dimension.

    In contrast, Rand argued that capitalism is moral precisely because it allows men to pursue their self-interest. At an implicit level, most Americans understand this. They want to be happy, prosper, and pursue goals and values that are important to their own lives.

    And this country is a beacon of hope to millions of people around the world precisely because it promises an "American dream" where honest, hard-working people can make a better life for themselves. It is this promise that drew my parents to America from Taiwan over 40 years ago. They came over to this country with little more than the clothes on their back. But they worked hard, prospered, sent two children to medical school, and are now enjoying a happy and well-earned retirement.

    Many thinkers on the right do a very good job defending capitalism on economic grounds. But capitalism needs a moral defense as well. Right-leaning thinkers too-often find themselves losing the political debate to leftists who claim the moral high ground by attacking capitalism as "selfish" and promoting socialism as noble precisely because it isn't selfish. Americans want to "do what's right", so if a leftist tells them that capitalism is immoral whereas socialism is moral, they'll keep falling for leftist demagogues even though socialist ideas never work in practice.

    For this reason, intellectuals on the right need to proudly and unabashedly defend capitalism as moral -- not despite the fact that it allows men to pursue their self-interest but *because* it allows men to pursue their self-interest.

    Ayn Rand was the first thinker to make this fully moral defense of capitalism to the American people. For our sakes, I hope she's not the last.
    (BTW, much of what I've said is straight from Eric Daniels' superb lecture, "The Morality of Capitalism".)

    Read more...

    Antibiotics and Livestock

    By Diana Hsieh

    In today's Food Link-O-Rama, I quoted a Scientific American article on new research showing that lettuce and other vegetables contained active antibiotics if grown in manure from livestock treated with routine antibiotics. About the story, I simply said:

    At some point, I'll blog about why I avoid meat from animals treated with hormones and antibiotics. Regarding this story, I'll just say that I don't want to be ingesting antibiotics without some specific medical reason for doing so -- not even in small doses.
    As I should have expected, someone asked about my views in the comments, and I wrote far more than I intended. So I thought I should post it as its own blog post. Here it is, somewhat edited:

    I'm not opposed to taking antibiotics when medically necessary, nor to giving them to animals when medically necessary. By "medically necessary," I mean when you have an infection, before surgery to prevent infection, and the like.

    However, that's not what happens with factory farmed livestock. For example, cows are packed very tightly into filthy feed lots and fed an inappropriate diet of corn to fatten them for slaughter. They are given antibiotics in their feed to prevent infection and promote growth. In other words, we're not taking about antibiotics given to livestock when sick, but antibiotics given routinely to them, perhaps for their whole lives. About 40% of antibiotics produced in the US goes to livestock. (For more basic details, see this Consumer's Union article.)

    I don't know whether those antibiotics can be found in the milk or meat that most people buy at the grocery store; I suspect not. However, I do know that this misuse of antibiotics promotes the evolution of antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria. If those strains spread to humans, as apparently some have done, they can be extraordinarily dangerous. At the very least, people need to be cured by stronger antibiotics, often with hospital stays and worse side effects. If those stronger antibiotics do not work, then the infected people can die. That's not good.

    Notably, the problem is not merely that farm and slaughterhouse workers might spread resistant bacteria to humans. According to this NY Times article, researchers have shown that such resistant strains of bacteria show up in the very meat you buy at the grocery store.

    This new research on antibiotics residue on vegetables shows another route by which the resistant bacteria might be generated, namely anywhere the manure of livestock treated with routine antibiotics is used as fertilizer. Perhaps worse, people will ingest still-operative antibiotics by eating ordinary raw vegetables like lettuce.

    Speaking generally, it's a bad idea to take antibiotics without a medical reason for doing so, particularly if you don't know what you're taking or in what doses. Even in small quantities, these antibiotics might interact badly with other drugs; a person might be allergic to them; they might reduce the effectiveness of a woman's birth control pill; they might kill the good bacteria in your gut that aid digestion.

    For as long as I've known how antibiotics work, I've been been irritated by the fact that people misuse them. They don't take the whole dose; they take them intermittently; they demand them from their doctor when they just have the cold or the flu. That irritates me because it endangers human health and human lives by promoting the evolution of resistant strains of bacteria.

    Once I questioned my assumptions about the ordinary methods of food production, it dawned on me that the routine use of antibiotics with livestock is probably a far greater danger than some person stopping his antibiotics after a few days. From what I've read since then, that seems to be the case.

    Unlike many people, I cannot regard stricter FDA controls on antibiotic use as the answer to this problem. The FDA is a pernicious agency; it should be abolished, not given wider powers. However, I do think:
    1. that people infected with superbugs due to the overuse of antibiotics in livestock should be able to sue the farms and perhaps even the drug manufacturers, if they can prove causation

    2. that drug companies should have property rights over antibiotics for years longer, provided that they actively take action to maintain the value of the drug, such as by licensing it only for certain medically necessary uses

    3. that people ought to stop supporting the routine feeding of antibiotics to livestock by refraining from buying meat, eggs, and dairy from animals thus fed as much as possible.
    Personally, I avoid meat, eggs, and dairy products from factory-farmed animals as much as I can. Such animals are raised without antibiotics or hormones. The animals are raised in far better conditions. (I like animals, so that matters to me.) And the food tastes much, much better than the standard @&#$* found in the grocery store. Although it can be somewhat more expensive, I regard it as well worth the price.

    Read more...

    Food Link-O-Rama

    By Diana Hsieh

  • Modern Forager's Best Blogging from 2008: You might want to check out Artificial Sweeteners Linked to Weight Gain and What Sweetener Should You Choose? Sugar? Honey? Agave Nectar?.

  • Dr. Eades recently pointed someone interested in the health effects of salt to The (Political) Science of Salt, a lengthy 1998 article by Gary Taubes. It's well worth reading -- particularly if you think that healthy eating for a normal person requires any kind of salt deprivation.

  • Is Being Healthy A Vain Pursuit?: Scott Kustes of Modern Forager got a rash of comments on this post. I didn't have time to add one, but I do think that the real question is moral, to wit: is it permissible to spend your own time, money, and energy pursuing the joys and pleasures your own life, rather than catering to others? Obviously, by any rational standard, the answer is YES.

  • Worried About Antibiotics In Your Beef? Vegetables May Be No Better: Scientific American reports that "new studies show vegetables like lettuce and potatoes--even organic ones--carry antibiotics." Here's the opening paragraphs of the article:
    For half a century, meat producers have fed antibiotics to farm animals to increase their growth and stave off infections. Now scientists have discovered that those drugs are sprouting up in unexpected places: Vegetables such as corn, potatoes and lettuce absorb antibiotics when grown in soil fertilized with livestock manure, according to tests conducted at the University of Minnesota.

    Today, close to 70 percent of all antibiotics and related drugs used in the United States are routinely fed to cattle, pigs and poultry, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists. Although this practice sustains a growing demand for meat, it also generates public health fears associated with the expanding presence of antibiotics in the food chain.

    People have long been exposed to antibiotics in meat and milk. Now, the new research shows that they also may be ingesting them from vegetables, perhaps even ones grown on organic farms.

    The Minnesota researchers planted corn, green onion and cabbage in manure-treated soil in 2005 to evaluate the environmental impacts of feeding antibiotics to livestock. Six weeks later, the crops were analyzed and found to absorb chlortetracycline, a drug widely used to treat diseases in livestock. In another study two years later, corn, lettuce and potato were planted in soil treated with liquid hog manure. They, too, accumulated concentrations of an antibiotic, named Sulfamethazine, also commonly used in livestock. As the amount of antibiotics in the soil increased, so too did the levels taken up by the corn, potatoes and other plants.

    "Around 90 percent of these drugs that are administered to animals end up being excreted either as urine or manure," said Holly Dolliver, a member of the Minnesota research team and now a professor of crop and soil sciences at the University of Wisconsin-River Falls. "A vast majority of that manure is then used as an important input for 9.2 million hectares of (U.S.) agricultural land." Manure, widely used as a substitute for chemical fertilizer, adds nutrients that help plants grow. It is often used in organic farming.

    The scientists found that although their crops were only propagated in greenhouses for six weeks--far less than a normal growing season--antibiotics were absorbed readily into their leaves. If grown for a full season, drugs most likely would find their way into parts of plants that humans eat, said Dolliver.

    Less than 0.1 percent of antibiotics applied to soil were absorbed into the corn, lettuce and other plants. Though a tiny amount, health implications for people consuming such small, cumulative doses are largely unknown.
    Read the rest here. At some point, I'll blog about why I avoid meat from animals treated with hormones and antibiotics. Regarding this story, I'll just say that I don't want to be ingesting antibiotics without some specific medical reason for doing so -- not even in small doses.

    Read more...
  • Back to TOP