A daily dose of philosophical food for your noodle... bacon for your brain!

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Best of 2008

By Diana Hsieh

I recently asked my fellow NoodleFoodlers to send me a few of their best posts from 2008, as a way of highlighting the best we've offered this year. Here's what they submitted. Please feel free to nominate your own favorite NoodleFood posts of 2008 in the comments!

Paul:

Greg:
Paula:
Gina:
Roderick:
Brandon:
And last but not least, me:
I want to heartily thank all of my fellow NoodleFoodlers for their excellent contributions to this blog over the past year. NoodleFood is a far better blog for those posts, and they are very, very much appreciated. I'd also like to thank the many knowledgeable, insightful, and amusing folks who post to the comments.

Three cheers for the NoodleFoodlers! Three cheers for the NoodleFoodleDoodlers!

And most of all: Happy New Year!

Read more...

Speed Camera Abuses

By Paul Hsieh

Some Maryland high school students are using speed cameras to "exact revenge on people who they believe have wronged them in the past, including other students and even teachers".

According to this article:

High school students in Maryland are using speed cameras as a tool to fine innocent drivers in a game, according to the Montgomery County Sentinel newspaper. Because photo enforcement devices will automatically mail out a ticket to any registered vehicle owner based solely on a photograph of a license plate, any driver could receive a ticket if someone else creates a duplicate of his license plate and drives quickly past a speed camera. The private companies that mail out the tickets often do not bother to verify whether vehicle registration information for the accused vehicle matches the photographed vehicle.

...A speed camera is located out in front of Wootton High School, providing a convenient location for generating the false tickets. Instead of purchasing license plates, students have ready access to laser printers that can create duplicate license plates using glossy paper using readily available fonts. For example, the state name of "Maryland" appears on plates in a font similar to Garamond Number 5 Swash Italic. Once the camera flashes, the driver can quickly pull over and remove the fake paper plate. The victim will receive a $40 ticket in the mail weeks later.
These speed cameras are a technological embodiment of the flawed principle of "guilty until proven innocent". These sorts of "pranks" (and the subsequent injustices) are a predictable result of this bad approach to enforcing the law.

Read more...

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Best Animal Videos of 2008, Part 3

By Diana Hsieh

CityRag posted a list of the best animal videos of 2008. Here are the last of my favorites:



Read more...

Hsieh OpEd: "Polis vs Polis on Cars and Health Care"

By Paul Hsieh

The December 28, 2008 Boulder Daily Camera has published my latest OpEd on health care. Interestingly, the first online comment in response was from Congressman-elect Jared Polis himself.

Here's the OpEd:

Polis vs. Polis on cars and health care

By Dr. Paul Hsieh
Sunday, December 28, 2008

Boulder's Congressman-elect Jared Polis recently took a bold stand against a federal bailout of the automobile industry, correctly arguing that that the car manufacturers' problems should be handled by the private sector, not the government. Coloradans should urge him to apply the same principles to the issue of health care reform.

In the Dec. 10 Wall Street Journal, Polis wrote: "Our United States Congress... now finds itself poring over 'business plans' submitted this week by Ford, GM and Chrysler. People who have never before in their lives seen -- no less implemented -- a business plan are now trying to decide if these companies will succeed by means of a 'capital infusion' with... [taxpayer] money. Something is wrong with this picture."

Polis is absolutely correct on this point. As a successful businessman himself, he knows that government cannot and should not be manufacturing cars.

His argument applies even more strongly to the issue of health care. Although he campaigned on a platform of government-run "single payer" health care, he should recognize that government cannot and should not be running health care.

Similar socialized medical systems in other countries are consistent failures, leading only to harsh rationing and long waiting lists. In Canada's "single payer" system, a woman who feels a lump in her breast might wait months for the surgery and chemotherapy she needs. In contrast, a Boulder woman could get the care she needed in a few days.

Furthermore, whenever government attempts to guarantee "universal health care," it must also control it. Government then decide who gets what health care and when, not doctors and patients. In single payer systems, far from being a "right," health care becomes just another privilege dispensed at the discretion of government bureaucrats.

A 20-year old Canadian snowboarder who hurts his knee on the slopes might wait almost a year for an MRI scan, if the government does not consider it an "emergency." Yet such a delay in proper diagnosis and treatment could result in a permanent crippling arthritis by age 30. A Colorado snowboarder with the same injury could receive the necessary scan and surgery in a few weeks, avoiding such a life-long disability.

Finally, single payer health care necessarily interposes the government into the doctor-patient relationship in the name of cost control. According to the Telegraph, Great Britain's National Health Service paid bonuses to primary care physicians who reduced the numbers of referrals to hospital specialists -- thus forcing those doctors to choose between their oaths to their patients or the government which pays their salaries.

This corrosive effect on the doctor-patient relationship is one of the worst evils of single payer health care. The evil is not that it allows a few doctors to act badly, but rather that it takes good doctors and encourages them to become bad physicians willing to betray their patients' best medical interests.

The fundamental flaw behind single payer systems (or any other form of "universal health care") is the assumption that health care is a "right" that must be guaranteed by the government. Health care is a need, not a right. Rights are freedoms of action (such as the right to free speech), not automatic claims on goods or services that must be produced by another. There's no such thing as a "right" to a car -- or a tonsillectomy.

Individuals are legitimately entitled to health care that they purchase with their own money, are promised by prior contractual agreements, or are given to them via voluntary charity.

Any attempts to guarantee an alleged "right" to health care must necessarily violate the genuine rights of others -- such as the physicians who are forced deliver health care on the government's terms (rather than their own) and the taxpayers who are forced to pay for others' health care against their will.

Socialism doesn't work for car manufacturing, and won't work for health care. Congressman-elect Polis correctly understands that the government should not be running the auto industry. If Coloradans value their lives and their health, they should urge him to apply that same understanding to health care and to support free market reforms, instead of a "single payer" system. After all, it is their own future health care at stake.

Dr. Paul Hsieh of Sedalia is co-founder, Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine

Read more...

Monday, December 29, 2008

Link-O-Rama

By Diana Hsieh

  • Questions from 2008 Not Answered in Slate's Explainer column. Here's a good questions:
    I live in Washington, D.C., and we have very long escalators coming out of the Metro. If I grabbed the handrail when I first step onto the escalator and did not let go until I was at the top, my body would be almost prostrate across the steps. As I go higher on the escalator, I have to readjust the hand that is grabbing the rubber handrail. Why can't the companies that make escalators sync the steps and the handrails so that they go the same speed?
    I suspect that the rail is traveling a longer distance than the steps yet moved with the same motor, so it must go faster. Here's a funny one:
    Can men eat the Activia yogurt that is advertised exclusively to the modern woman in khakis? Will it have the same internal regulatory effects on the male system that are promised for the female bowels? If not, why not?
    In fact, the yogurt only works for women who wear khakis at least four days per week. (Actually, Activa is gross. They add cornstarch to it, presumably to make it less runny. Personally, I get all kinds of lovely natural bacterial cultures from my raw milk and raw milk yogurt.) And, I can't resist this gem:
    How long can humans live when they are caught on fire? For example, when a car crashes and explodes turns into a gulf of flames, but humans are alive.
    Uh, dude, why do you need to know? Just FYI, it's a bad idea to set yourself or your fellow fraternity brothers on fire. (Via The Agitator.)

  • TUAW reviewed a cute little Christmas shopping app from Target. (Too late for to be useful now, I know.) How was life possible before third party iPhone apps?!? And why won't my tasks sync yet?!?

  • Does anyone else find it ironic that Britney Spears' two new singles contain lyrics rather strange for a young woman in conservatorship under her father due to mental problems? Womanizer includes the lines, "You say I'm crazy / I got your crazy." Uh, yeah. Circus has "I'm like the ringleader / I call the shots." Uh, I don't think so. Actually, I like both songs for the fluffy pop that they are, and I do hope to see more healthy, sane, and half-naked Britney shaking her rear for our enjoyment. Still, I'm amused.

    Read more...
  • A New Dog

    By Diana Hsieh

    I am utterly desperate for a dog. I miss Kate terribly, and I miss Abby now more than ever. Mostly, however, I miss the presence of a good farm dog in our lives. I miss being a pack leader. I miss being welcomed home by a wagging tail. I miss my faithful companion for feeding the horses. I miss the security of the sharp alarm bark. I miss the diligent licking of plates. I miss the silly games and antics. I miss talking to the best of listeners. I miss having my doggie friend at my side.

    Paul and I adopted Kate and Abby as adults from a shelter. This time, I've said that I want puppy. I've also said that I wanted to buy a dog from a breeder, so as to avoid (as much as possible) the kind of genetic problems suffered by both Kate and Abby. (Kate had very bad hip dysplasia; Abby developed degenerative myelopathy. Both diseases are common in German Shepherds, thanks to the AKC's focus on form rather than function.)

    However, after reading this Sports Illustrated article (with pictures) on what happened to Michael Vick's dogs -- and perusing the web site of the Front Range German Shepherd Rescue -- I'm rethinking that decision. We might get a rescue dog instead.

    In addition to their inherent excellent qualities as dogs, Paul and I found great pleasure in knowing that we had rescued Kate and Abby. Kate was obviously pampered in her previous home, but her orthopedic problems were quite serious. Another family might not have been able to afford the hip replacement surgery and pain management that enabled her to live so well for so long. Abby was not well-treated by her prior owner: she had been pretty seriously neglected by a [something unprintable] only interested in breeding her. She was 20 pounds underweight when we adopted her, and her behavior clearly indicated that she'd only been sporadically fed and watered. So by the kind of life we offered Kate and Abby, we helped them reach their full doggie potential. We saved them. And in turn, they rewarded us with their utmost loyalty. They were truly excellent dogs.

    Undoubtedly, I want a young dog. And we're set on another German Shepherd: we like the steady temperament and strong loyalty that characterizes the breed. So perhaps we should aim for a German Shepherd between six months to a year, so that we can test for hip dysplasia before adopting him/her.

    The terrible part is that I can't possibly spare the time for a new dog until the dissertation is done. So Paul and I will have to endure life without a dog for a few more months. That won't be fun. However, the prospect of rescuing another dog feels like the right course. It feels like we'll be honoring all that Kate and Abby were to us and all we were to them -- and I like that thought very much.

    Read more...

    Sunday, December 28, 2008

    Recap #24

    By Diana Hsieh

    This week on Politics without God, the blog of the Coalition for Secular Government:

    This week on We Stand FIRM, the blog of FIRM: Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine:
    This week on FA/RM, the blog of Free Agriculture - Restore Markets:

    Read more...

    Sunday Open Thread #29

    By Diana Hsieh

    Here's yet another a Sunday Open Thread for your thoughts:

    For anyone in the fiery grip of a random question, comment, joke, or link they'd like to share with NoodleFood readers, I hereby open up the comments on this post to any respectable topic. (Please refrain from posting personal attacks, pornographic material, and commercial solicitations.)

    Read more...

    Saturday, December 27, 2008

    Free Book About Lunch

    By Diana Hsieh

    As the saying goes, there's no such thing as a free lunch. However, you can get a free book about breakfast, lunch, and dinner!

    Yesterday, I was delighted to discover that Dr. Michael Eades announced that he and his wife, Dr. Mary Dan Eades, were offering their book The Protein Power Lifeplan for free. (It's a Christmas present; they've done it in the past. Go Santa!) You just have to pay shipping if you order it online. It's totally free if you can pick it up in person in Eagle, Idaho. The offer ends on January 5th.

    Guy Adamson of FA/RM wrote me about the offer this morning, saying:

    This is an excellent book on diet I highly recommend. Even if you have read Protein Power, I think LifePlan is a more complete book ... If Good Calories, Bad Calories scare the grains [and sugars!] out of you, LifePlan takes similar information and presents it in a way you can apply to your life.
    I've not yet read Protein Power but I'm a huge fan of Dr. Eades' blog. So I'll be ordering my copy this weekend, probably with some krill oil.

    Thank you, Drs. Eades!

    Read more...

    Friday, December 26, 2008

    IOS/TOC/TAS Death Watch

    By Diana Hsieh

    That pretend-Objectivist organization lately known as "The Atlas Society" has canceled its 2009 Summer Seminar due to financial woes. They intend to spend the time and money saved working on their ancient booby-trap of a web site. Robert Campbell posted the letter he received from Will Thomas. Here it is, in full:

    Thanks again for sending me your presentation ideas for the planned 2009 Summer Seminar on Objectivism in Theory and Practice. I’m sorry to say that we will not be holding a Seminar next year after all.

    The Summer Seminar is a vital part of our community-building and academic efforts. We do not intend to abandon those goals. Actually, we envision resuming the Summer Seminar tradition in 2010.

    Our decision to suspend the Summer Seminar in 2009 is due to the economic circumstances and a constructive rearrangement of staff priorities looking forward.

    It’s obvious to everyone that the future lies on the internet. It has become clear to us at TAS that one of our most urgent priorities is to update, invigorate, and expand our website to make it a more powerful vehicle for outreach and education about open Objectivism. With the web, we can and do reach hundreds of thousands, even millions of people. The Summer Seminar, for all that is an intense and uplifting personal experience, can only touch, at most, a few hundred people each year. If we have to choose between the two, the choice is clear.

    Making our internet plans a reality will require taking substantial amounts of staff time, including mine, away from other projects and refocusing on web projects. Even in normal economic times, we would not be able to avoid the conflict by hiring additional staff, since key aspects of the web project require the expertise of current staff.

    So please look for us to put up an improved and livelier web presence in 2009, and keep an eye out next Fall for the call for proposals for our 2010 seminars. Assuming things continue according to plan, I'll be writing back to you in the Fall to see if you would like to renew your proposals. I'm sorry we won't be able to invite you to speak this year.
    My best guess is that the Summer Seminar will not be resumed in 2010 -- or ever. IOS/TOC/TAS is a dying beast.

    In recent years, their summer seminar has been ailing in a serious way. It went from about 300 attendees in 2003 (when I last attended) to something like 100 in 2008. (In contrast, ARI's OCON has grown from about 300 attendees in 2003 to over 500 in 2007 and 2008.)

    The only other discernible activity of the organization has been its magazine, The New Individualist. That failed to draw a broad readership, as they'd hoped. More importantly, its editor Robert Bidinotto left TAS entirely in mid-October, apparently on not-so-friendly terms. (That link is temporarily unavailable, unfortunately.)

    Oh, and no one seems to know what the heck David Kelley does with his time; he hasn't produced anything substantial in many years.

    In short, IOS/TOC/TAS has been dying for some years now. And with the Ayn Rand Center now open and active in Washington, I don't think it can survive much longer. As someone who wasted far too much precious time with them, I think I've earned the right to say, "Good riddance to bad rubbish!"

    Read more...

    Best Animal Videos of 2008, Part 2

    By Diana Hsieh

    CityRag posted a list of the best animal videos of 2008. Here are more of my favorites, both featuring weird cats, with two more to come in a future post:



    Read more...

    Thursday, December 25, 2008

    Merry Christmas!

    By Diana Hsieh

    Merry Christmas!

    Here are two questions for you:

    1. What do you like most about your Christmas this year?

    2. What will you do differently next year to have an even better Christmas?

    Personally, I'm most looking forward to our traditional Christmas dinner with some friends from 1FROG at the always-fantastic Opus Restaurant in Littleton.

    Unfortunately, I won't be doing much else with my day. Paul left bright and early this morning to go to work; he'll be done around 3 pm. I'm slated to do a full measure of dissertation writing today, as chapter seven has taken me a bit longer than I supposed, albeit for the very good reason that I've had develop some major new ideas in it.

    Next year, I plan to enjoy Christmas by having more of a Christmas. I'd like to put up some decorations, as well as do some holiday-inspired cooking. That will be possible because I'll be a doctor of philosophy, rather than a mere dissertating grunt of a graduate student!

    Oh, and I almost forgot: Here's a truly delightful tale -- no kidding this time -- that I read for the first time just a few weeks ago: "Merry Gravmas" by James P. Hogan. It's a short short story, but quite memorable: I've found myself mulling over the prospect of such a rational future more than a few times since I first read it.

    Hence, Merry Gravmas!

    Read more...

    Wednesday, December 24, 2008

    Objectivist Roundup #76

    By Diana Hsieh

    Rational Jenn has the latest Objectivist Roundup. Go check it out!

    Read more...

    A Touching Christmas Story

    By Diana Hsieh

    Ah gentle readers, you know that I'm a sucker for a touching Christmas story. Here's one from the UK:

    About four weeks ago, I was rushing around trying to get some last-minute shopping done. I was stressed out and not thinking very fondly of the Christmas season right then. It was dark, cold, and wet in the multi-story car park. I realised that I had lost the shop receipt, which I would need to get out of the car park without paying. So, mumbling under my breath, I retraced my steps to the shopping centre entrance.

    As I was searching the wet pavement, I heard a quiet sobbing. The crying was coming from a poorly dressed boy of about ten years old. He was short and thin. He had no coat. He had only a ragged flannel shirt to protect him from the evening chill. He was holding two fifty pound notes in his hand.

    Thinking that he had got separated from his parents, I asked him what was wrong, and he told me his sad story. He came from a large family. His father had died when he was seven years old. His mother worked two full time jobs to make ends meet. Nevertheless, she had managed to scrimp and save two hundred pounds to buy her children Christmas presents. She had dropped him off at the shopping centre on the way to her second job. He was to use the money to buy presents for all his brothers and sisters and save just enough to take the bus home. He had not even entered the shopping centre when an older boy grabbed two of his fifty pound notes and disappeared into the night.

    "Why didn't you scream for help?" I asked. The boy said, "I did!"

    "And nobody came to help you?" The boy stared at the ground and sadly shook his head.

    "How loud did you scream?" I enquired. The soft-spoken boy looked up and meekly whispered, "Help me!"

    I realised that absolutely no one could have heard that poor boy cry for help. So I grabbed his other two fifty pound notes and scarpered.
    (Via Valzhalla.)

    Read more...

    Tuesday, December 23, 2008

    Rudolph Would Die Rather Than Wear One of These

    By Diana Hsieh

    It not too late to get your least-favorite relative the ugliest Christmas sweater money can buy.

    Update: Upon further reflection, I definitely like the last one the best, even though it's a Hanukkah sweater.

    Read more...

    Ralston and Hsieh LTEs in Wall Street Journal

    By Paul Hsieh

    The December 22, 2008 edition of the Wall Street Journal has printed two contiguous LTEs written by Objectivists criticizing Obama's health care plans. One is by Richard Ralston, director of Americans for Free Choice in Medicine and the second is by myself. Both were in response to their December 9, 2008 article, "The Obama Health-Care Express".

    Here are the two LTEs:

    Three Big Problems With Obama's Health-Care Plan

    You are probably correct that a major new national health-care program will be rushed through the next Congress without substantial debate through some mechanism such as budget reconciliation. That is because many of its elements would not survive close examination. The fatuous claim of Sen. Max Baucus that placing the nation's medical care under the rule of an "independent" council of presidentially appointed experts would not constitute government management of care is only the most conspicuous example. Others include the claim that computerizing those remaining medical records still on paper would reduce insurance costs by $2,500 a year per family.

    But the main reason for the big rush is that nobody has a clue how the government will pay for it -- anymore than they know how the current unfunded liability of Medicare and Medicaid can be honored.

    The last thing that proponents want is for anyone to ask where the money will come from, except perhaps questions about such details as the individual rights of patients and physicians to make their own medical decisions without the approval of presidentially appointed experts.

    Richard E. Ralston
    Executive Director
    Americans for Free Choice in Medicine
    Newport Beach, Calif.


    Businesses expecting to save money under President-elect Barack Obama's universal health-care plan are going to be in for a rude awakening. President-elect Obama's plan includes an employer mandate in which businesses must either pay their employee health insurance or else pay into a government fund to cover the uninsured.

    A similar mandate has already been in place in Massachusetts for two years. As health costs there have skyrocketed, the state government has asked for more and more "contributions" from businesses. During this financial crisis, the last thing America needs is yet more economic burdens on the businessmen who create jobs and prosperity.

    The fundamental problem with Mr. Obama's plan is the premise that health care is a "right" that must be guaranteed by the government. Health care is a need, not a right. Rights are freedoms of action, not automatic claims on goods and services that must be produced by another. Attempting to guarantee an alleged "right" to health care must necessarily violate actual individual rights and will destroy the American economy in the process.

    Paul Hsieh, M.D.
    Sedalia, Colo.
    We are reaching people with our ideas.

    Read more...

    Hsieh LTE in Christian Science Monitor

    By Paul Hsieh

    The December 17, 2008 Christian Science Monitor featured an article on the internal debate within the Republican Party entitled, "Young Republicans seek a new kind of party".

    I sent them the following LTE in response, which they published in the December 22, 2008 issue:

    GOP's 'social conservatism' alienates young Republicans

    In regard to the Dec. 17 article, "Young Republicans seek a new kind of party": I voted Republican in 1996, 2000, and 2004, but not in 2008, because I was finally fed up with the ever-increasing influence of the religious right on the Republican Party – especially on issues such as abortion, stem-cell research, and gay marriage.

    If the GOP returned to affirming individual rights, limited government, and fiscal responsibility, then I would be glad to support it again.

    But as long as they support the toxic "social conservative" agenda of the religious right, then they will continue to alienate many young and independent voters and lose elections. And deservedly so.

    Paul Hsieh
    Sedalia, Colo.

    Read more...

    Monday, December 22, 2008

    Symposium on Atlas Shrugged at UT Austin

    By Diana Hsieh

    Mark your calendars:

    Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged: Celebrating the Best Within Us

    Please join us for a symposium offering contemporary perspectives on Ayn Rand's magnum opus, both as philosophy and as literature. Speakers include Dr. Allan Gotthelf (University of Pittsburgh), Dr. Shoshana Milgram (Virginia Tech), Dr. Onkar Ghate (Ayn Rand Institute), and Jeff Britting (Associate Producer of the Academy Award-nominated documentary "Ayn Rand: A Sense of Life"). All sessions will include question periods, and an open reception with the speakers will be held immediately afterwards.

    Date: March 4, 2009
    Time: 4:00-6:30pm
    Location: The University of Texas at Austin - ACES Auditorium (ACES 2.302)

    For details, visit www.UTBBTChairObjectivism.com or email objectivism@austin.utexas.edu.
    For those of you in Colorado rather than Texas, the Philosophy Department at the University of Colorado at Boulder will be hosting a debate between Dr. Onkar Ghate and Dr. Michael Huemer on the Objectivist ethics on March 2nd from 7:30 to 9:00 pm in the Old Main Chapel, as part of its Think! series. I'm the graduate student promoter/organizer of the series, so I'll be posting more details on this debate when I have them settled. It should be an excellent event.

    Read more...

    Underwriters Laboratories

    By Paul Hsieh

    The Decmeber 17, 2008 Christian Science Monitor has a terrific profile of Underwriters Laboratories. This is the private organization that performs safety certifications of an enormous range of consumer products, including extension cord, washing machines, and even bulletproof glass.

    Here are few excerpts from the article:

    Every product they test is at the request, and the expense, of its manufacturer, who seeks out UL not because it has to -- no federal law mandates safety tests for most items -- but because it's cheaper and easier than a product-injury lawsuit, Drengenberg says. In fact, most retailers won't stock a product if it hasn't been safety tested. But it's all voluntary, a tidy case study of the free market at its best: bottom-line drivers of consumer good.

    ..."We have one weapon in the factory... The UL mark," says [tester John] Drengenberg. So UL guards it carefully, through a rigorous documentation process. Every product tested is photographed, all of its parts cataloged, and every test performed described in detail. If it passes, the manufacturer puts it on the assembly line -- but at some point during production, a UL inspector will show up, unannounced, for a spot-check, making sure the company is using all the same parts UL saw on the prototype
    This is an excellent concrete example of how such private certification agencies could thrive and succeed in a free market, because they meet a rational consumer demand for trustworthy and independent product safety certification.

    In a truly free market, comparable private agencies can and should replace the current alphabet-soup of costly inefficient government bureaucracies such as the FDA, OSHA, NTSB, etc.

    Read more...

    Sunday, December 21, 2008

    Recap #23

    By Diana Hsieh

    This week on Politics without God, the blog of the Coalition for Secular Government:

    This week on We Stand FIRM, the blog of FIRM: Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine:
    This week on FA/RM, the blog of Free Agriculture - Restore Markets:

    Read more...

    Sunday Open Thread #28

    By Diana Hsieh

    Here's yet another a Sunday Open Thread for your thoughts:

    For anyone in the fiery grip of a random question, comment, joke, or link they'd like to share with NoodleFood readers, I hereby open up the comments on this post to any respectable topic. (Please refrain from posting personal attacks, pornographic material, and commercial solicitations.)

    Read more...

    Saturday, December 20, 2008

    Breakfast This Morning

    By Diana Hsieh

    This morning, Paul and I split the following tasty bits for breakfast:

    • 1.5 slices uncured bacon (Applegate Farms)
    • 4 slices uncured Canadian bacon (Applegate Farms)
    • 3 farm fresh eggs fried in bacon grease
    • 1.5 cups cauliflower, leftover from dinner
    • 4 slices of raw milk cheddar cheese (Organic Valley)
    • 1/2 an avocado
    • 1 clementine
    I prepared the whole breakfast in about 15 minutes. It was fabulously delicious, wonderfully hearty, and perfectly healthy. And to think, a year ago, I would have preferred pancakes and syrup!

    Read more...

    Food Link-O-Rama

    By Diana Hsieh

    Because I don't have time to write up my planned post on barefoot running (!!), I'm going to dump some links on you from my overflowing "Blog Me - Food" bookmarks folder. It's good stuff, so enjoy!

  • I recently discovered Lorette C. Luzajic, a food writer for Gremolata, via a two part interview on Modern Forager: Part I and Part 2. I very much liked the interview -- and the two articles that I read:
    • Spilling The Beans: The Trouble with Soy. If you eat tofu -- or processed foods of any kind, most of which contain soy -- you might want to think twice about this supposed health food.

    • I'm A Natural Born Killer. Is vegetarianism the healthy lifestyle that most of us just don't have the willpower to adopt? Or is it just modern asceticism slathered in propaganda?
    Also, her blog looks interesting, although not often updated.

  • Stephan has been kicking ass and taking names, yet again. Go check out his latest offerings. You'll never look at your french fries the same again -- and not because of the carb-heavy potatoes.

  • "Eat a Balanced Diet" and Other Useless Advice by Johnny Bowden. He nails the problem with advice like "eat a balanced diet," "everything in moderation, "eat less junk food," and even "eat more fruits and vegetables." He writes:
    What is a balanced diet? What elements should be balanced? Everything in moderation? Does that include sugar for sugar addicts, or alcohol for alcoholics? What is junk food? Is it synonomous with fast food? All fast food, or just some of it? You mean "slow food" can't be junk? And which fruits and vegetables should we eat "more of?" How much more? Are they all created equal? Are fruits and vegetables even equivalent on the nutritional pantheon?
    He then offers some basic (and good) answers to those questions.

  • Inside the Story: Gary Taubes: What if It's All Been a Big Fat Lie? An interesting interview with Gary Taubes about his 2002 NY Times article, What if It's All Been a Big Fat Lie?. Here's a tidbit:
    HENRY: Did the reaction to your NYT Magazine story surprise you?

    TAUBES: Yes. Even though I knew the article would be the most controversial article the Times Magazine ran all year, it still shocked me. More than anything, it was the viciousness of some of the responses. One of my good friends in the science journalism business--someone who had written a book on obesity and concluded, as the establishment insists, that the culprits are over-consumption of fatty diets and inactivity--went from considering me one of the four or five best science writers in the country to accusing me of having had a brain transplant and making up the story to get a big book deal.
    I'm not surprised.

  • The Great Divide. A surprisingly good Washington Post article on the Weston A. Price Foundation.

    Read more...
  • Friday, December 19, 2008

    Link-O-Rama

    By Diana Hsieh

  • Terrorism That's Personal by Nicholas Kristof. An NY Times op-ed that you'll likely never forget.

  • What They Hate About Mumbai by Suketu Mehta. Another beautiful and poignant piece from the NY Times.

  • Bad Sex in Fiction Prize Awarded for 2008: The winner includes this gem of a line:
    I find myself gripping his ears and tugging at the locks curling over them, beside myself, and a strange animal noise escapes from me as the mounting, Wagnerian crescendo overtakes me.
    Maybe it's just me, but gripping someone's ears during sex sounds like a prelude to a visit to the emergency room. (Via The Hoondat Report.)

  • Wonder Woman and the Phallic Menace. (What can I say?!?)

  • Ranking Countries by Promiscuity. The US isn't very highly ranked, despite being The Great Satan.

    Read more...
  • Police on YouTube

    By Paul Hsieh

    The December 17, 2008 New York Times reports on the variety of reactions that NYPD police officers have to being videotaped while performing their official public duties in this interesting article, "Officers Become Accidental YouTube Stars".

    The article notes that videotaping police is entirely legal, as long as it doesn't interfere with the performance of their duties. And some police officers correctly recognize that fact:

    "People tape all the time," said an eight-year veteran of the department, a female officer in Downtown Brooklyn who, like other officers questioned for this article, spoke only on the condition of anonymity because she is not authorized to speak to reporters. "It makes you uncomfortable, but that's their right. You can't stop them from taping."
    Unfortunately other NYPD officers hold the following mistaken view:
    An officer directing traffic in Brooklyn asserted that it is illegal to tape police officers. "If I know that he's taking video, I'm going to walk up to him and stop him," the officer said.
    Or in another encounter:
    ...[A] man asks an officer if he may film him, and the officer replies, "You going to post them on the Internet? Then I'm going to have to break your camera over your face." But he and other officers laugh, as does the cameraman, who eventually walks away. The video had 19,370 views as of Tuesday evening.
    Provided that citizens don't interfere with official police duties, this sort of transparency is a good thing. It can protect innocent civilians from police misconduct as well as protect honest police officers from wrongful claims of misconduct.

    Given that it is perfectly legal for citizens to observe and truthfully write about any actions that police officers perform in public view while "on the job", it should be (and is) similarly legal to record their official actions on video.

    Update: As a concrete example, here's a related news story about an apparent assault by an NYPD officer caught on video:



    Note that the bicyclist was originally charged with "resisting arrest, disorderly conduct and obstructing government administration." After the video surfaced, those charges were dismissed.

    Read more...

    Thursday, December 18, 2008

    Best Animal Videos of 2008, Part 1

    By Diana Hsieh

    CityRag posted a list of the best animal videos of 2008. Here are some of my favorites, with more to come in future posts:



    Read more...

    Objectivist Roundup #75

    By Diana Hsieh

    Titanic Deck Chairs has the latest Objectivist Roundup. Go check it out!

    Read more...

    Credentials for Activism, Part 2

    By Diana Hsieh

    Back in November, I posted a question about activism: "What's the importance of credentials when writing or arguing for a cause?"

    In the comments, Steve Simpson of the Institute for Justice was kind enough to write a lengthy reply. I'm reposting it here, with his permission, because I thought it contained particularly good advice that I wanted to make sure that all NoodleFood readers saw:

    This is a very good and very important question, so I figured I would chime in and offer some thoughts from the perspective of someone who is a professional activist of sorts and has some experience in this area. I'm a lawyer at the Institute for Justice; in addition to litigating, we do quite a bit of writing and public speaking about our cases. So I have some experience in the area of "getting heard." (How's that for credentialing myself up front?)

    On the importance of credentials, I would say: if you have them, flaunt them (because they are way to get yourself heard, not because they matter to the truth or falsity of your ideas). If you don't, don't worry about it. As Diana pointed out, you shouldn't pursue an advanced degree just to credential yourself as an activist. It's much more important to focus on gaining the knowledge and the advocacy skills to be an effective activist than it is to try to become "credentialed" in some way. There are lots of people in the activist/policy world with no more than a bachelors degree (or less) who are regularly quoted and published.

    So if you want to be an effective activist, there are two things off the top of my head you can and should do. First, and most importantly, develop and hone your knowledge and advocacy skills. The good news is that the sky is the limit, and if you are interested in activism you already have the motivation. Pick an area in which you are interested and learn a lot about it, then start writing letters to the editor, op-eds, and talking and arguing with everyone you can about it. I think it makes the most sense to focus on a particular area rather than on something broad like philosophy in general, because you are much more likely to have pertinent information and to gain some expertise and experience if you focus more narrowly. You don't have to devote your life to the area; it's more a matter of setting priorities for a given period of time. For instance, for the next 6 months, I'm going to focus on health care, or the financial mess, or some idiotic environmental policy, etc., as opposed to the decline of western civilization, why the republicans and the democrats are stupid, etc. (Don't get me wrong; there's nothing wrong with gaining broad knowledge. It's just not enough if your interest is activism).

    You'll also need to practice your advocacy skills, primarily writing. There's a lot to say about this, so I will just say learn to write short, punchy, and informative letters and op-eds. Brevity is key if you want to get published, as is clarity of thought and expression. Practice, practice, practice. Write a letter to the editor every day. Focus on one or two points in everything your write. Edit ruthlessly.

    Second, although credentials are not terribly important in getting published (or just heard), some sort of a "hook" often is. There are two main types of hooks--news hooks and what I'll call "experiential" hooks (by the way, never use words like "experiential" in your writing). A news hook is simply something that is happening in the news that makes a particular letter or article or point of view relevant. Sometimes they are obvious, but often they aren't. Never assume that because others have not made a particular connection or have a particular insight it isn't worth writing about.

    An experiential hook is something that indicates that you have relevant experience or knowledge that connects you to what you are talking about. For good or ill, news organizations love to feature "relevant" voices on any subject. So Paul's voice in health care is relevant because he's a doctor, and Diana's is relevant on the amendment she opposed because she set up a group that opposed it. But there are many possible hooks of this sort, so be creative in thinking of relevant experiences you've had that might make your view stand out. Maybe you are a businessman who has specific knowlege on the impact of taxes and regulation; or someone who was in the military and can offer an informed perspective on conscription or the war. Also, again for better or worse, news organizations love contrast and seeming contradictions. So, for instance, an african american who oppose affirmative action will be more likely to get published than a white guy who does; and a gay person who supports the boy scouts' right to keep out gay people will be more likely to get published than a straight person. These are just examples to convey the point; there are many other possibilities here that go beyond immutable characteristics. For instance, if you are young or in college, write an article about why young people should not be encouraged to vote because so many of them are vacuous and uninformed. Or when national service comes back in vogue, write an op-ed about how you and many of your peers would prefer to let homeless people ladle out their own crappy soup while you try to live your lives and be happy and productive. The point is, there are lots of "hooks" like this that you can find to make your views stand out from the crowd and get published. Be creative, be entrepreneurial, and never, ever give up.
    Thank you, Steve!

    Read more...

    Wednesday, December 17, 2008

    Mayo Clinic?

    By Diana Hsieh

    This evening, I decided to make some ham salad with a good hunk of leftover uncured ham, but I didn't like the look or smell of the non-fat mayo I had in the fridge from my pre-paleo days. So I made my own mayonnaise using Monica's recipe. It turned out yummy -- and unlike the non-fat mayo, very real!

    Read more...

    Bunny of Death

    By Diana Hsieh

    Don't anger the bunny:



    (Via Tim Sandefur.)

    Read more...

    Buy a Toaster, Get a Free Bank!

    By Greg Perkins

    (Found anonymously floating by in a forwarded email.)

    Read more...

    Nature Gets Legal Rights in Ecuador

    By Diana Hsieh

    Wow: According to the progressive quarterly newspaper Positive News, Nature Gets Legal Rights in Ecuador:

    Approximately two-thirds of Ecuador's population voted 'yes' this Autumn, in a historic, national referendum ... [T]he Ecuadorians backed their president, Rafael Correa, in voting for a new progressive constitution - the first in the world to grant Nature the same inalienable rights as human beings. ...

    Dr Mario Melo, a lawyer specialising in Environmental Law and an advisor to Fundacion Pachamama, explained that the new constitution redefines people's relationship with Nature. It is not an object to be appropriated and exploited but rather a rights-bearing entity, that should be treated with parity under the law.

    "In this sense, the constitution reflects the traditions of the indigenous peoples living in Ecuador, who see Nature as a mother and call her by her proper name, Pachamama," Dr Mario Melo said.

    This new bill for Nature's 'right to exist' offers an alternative paradigm. It clearly acknowledges that all life on Earth is interconnected. It must be protected and respected for the sake of all species - beliefs which have long been obvious to Ecuador's indigenous peoples.

    The constitution provides explicit legal protection for the environment. Says one section: 'Nature or Pachamama, where life is reproduced and exists, has a right to exist, persist, maintain and regenerate its vital cycles, structures, functions and its processes in evolution.'

    It also decrees that the government must apply: 'precaution in all the activities that could lead to the extinction of any species, the destruction of ecosystems or cause the permanent alteration of natural cycles.'

    Although the government is ultimately responsible for upholding the new laws, in Ecuador, every individual, organisation or community now has the power to represent Nature in the courts and halt any damaging activities.

    Alberto Acosta, ex-president of the Ecuadorian Assembly, helped draft the new laws. He said: "If social justice was the axis of struggle in the 20th century, environmental justice is going to be the focus of conflicts for the 21st century."
    Does anyone know any more about this insanity?

    Read more...

    Tuesday, December 16, 2008

    Immigration Patterns

    By Diana Hsieh

    Via LGF, a cool video showing immigration patterns from 1870 to 2007:


    Immigration to the US, 1820-2007 v2 from Ian S on Vimeo.

    I wonder what the video would look like if America adopted an immigration policy consistent with individual rights.

    Read more...

    Link-O-Rama

    By Diana Hsieh

  • Obama and Reality by Myrhaf. Obama's emotional responses show that he lacks the ordinary person's tether to reality.

  • Making worthless data confess by Dr. Eades. I never knew nutritional studies could get quite this bad.

  • Bad Times Draw Bigger Crowds to Churches (NY Times)

  • Tips For Clueless People Who Get Mugged. It's mean but funny.

  • Some Christians Expecting Manna from Heaven. Hey, it's in the Bible! It must be true!

  • Free Mark Cuban: Objectivist Mark Wickens creates a web site opposing insider trading laws.

    Read more...
  • ’Twas the Night After Single Payer

    By Gina Liggett

    'Twas the night after Single Payer, when all through the land
    Not a creature had health care that could be called grand;

    The ERs were stuffed with those seeking care,
    In hopes Dr. Daschle soon would be there;

    The patients were all nestled sick in their beds,
    Hallucinating that sugar-plums danced in their heads;

    And doctors at their post, and nurses at their station,
    Had just hunkered down for a long Administration,

    When on the Rose Garden lawn there arose such a clatter,
    I turned on CNN to see what was the matter.

    Away to the screen it flew like a flash,
    Camera shutters were clicking, Dr. Daschle with his sash.

    TV lights shined in faces hailing the plan
    Gave the lustre of "quality" for each woman and man,

    When, what to my wondering eyes be endured,
    But a huge new department, and forty-eight million more insured,

    With a powerful new driver, two roles to fulfill,
    I knew in a moment it would be government overkill.

    Regulations not treatments his ideas they came,
    New restrictions, new rules, and he called them by name;

    "Now, Daschle! now, Dollar! now, Payer and Taxin'!
    On, Common! on Cure-all! on, Daunting and Blighted!

    To the top of the White House! it will hit the wall!
    Now cash away! cash away! cash away all!"

    As dry heaves that before an intestinal flare,
    With patients on the wait list, what do they care?

    So up in the bureaucracy the coursers they flew,
    Through the cabinets of paperwork, and Dr. Daschle too.

    And then, in a news conference, I heard more restrictions
    The limits and taxing and fewer prescriptions.

    As I called 911, one day writhing in pain,
    The response that I got could only be called insane.

    He was dressed in his scrubs, and checked my citizen's ID,
    And the equipment malfunctioned, but the diagnosis was free;

    A bundle of supplies, the treatment room disordered,
    But they lacked what was needed, what the Dr. had ordered.

    His eyes--how they glazed! dark circles how weary!
    His cheeks were so sallow, his job was so dreary!

    Another patient in line dehydrated like wheat,
    Uncontrolled diabetes, his blood sugar too sweet;

    The stump of a leg infected for weeks,
    It was surgical care that this patient seeks;

    He had Universal Insurance and a sad-looking face,
    Because it only covered some gauze and an Ace.

    He was pale and sweaty, a sickly young man,
    And I cried when I saw him, in spite of his free-coverage plan.

    A wink of the bureaucrat and a nod of her head,
    Said, with Single Payer I had nothing to dread;

    She spoke no more words, but took her first break,
    Civil servants remember their rules are at stake.

    And the Doctor came back, his fingers rubbing his eyes,
    And he gave me a med and some vague replies;

    He sprang to his computer, the new high-tech efficiency
    Sent my records to D.C. for some clerk to see.

    But I heard him exclaim, ere he walked out of sight,

    "Single Payer for all has become a nightmarish fright!"

    Read more...

    Monday, December 15, 2008

    Objectively Speaking: Ayn Rand Interviewed

    By Diana Hsieh

    This forthcoming-in-February book of Ayn Rand's interviews looks like a gem. Here's the announcement from the Ayn Rand Bookstore:

    Objectively Speaking: Ayn Rand Interviewed
    Edited by Marlene Podritske and Peter Schwartz

    Preorder now for expected delivery in early February

    Half a century of print and broadcast interviews of Ayn Rand are included in Objectively Speaking. This collection includes print interviews from the 1930s and 1940s, and edited transcripts of radio and television interviews from the 1950s through 1981. Ayn Rand's unusual and strikingly original insights on a vast range of topics are captured by prominent interviewers in American broadcasting, such as Johnny Carson, Edwin Newman, Mike Wallace and Louis Rukeyser. A remarkable series of radio interviews over a four-year period at Columbia University are also included. An appendix provides a transcript of a radio program of Leonard Peikoff discussing Ayn Rand's unique intellectual and literary achievements.

    (276 pages)

    Softcover: $29.95

    Hardcover: $34.95
    I was pretty interested in this book when I saw this announcement last week. Then I read an excerpt from it in the latest issue of Impact yesterday. (That's the newsletter that the Ayn Rand Institute sends to its donors.) In it, Ayn Rand compared the life of Olga, a young woman working in the USSR, with the life of Kitty, a young woman working in the US. It was awesome. Now I can't wait to read this book!

    Read more...

    Alkan and Hamelin: Two Names You Should Know

    By Brandon Byrd

    Charles-Valentin Alkan.

    Alkan's name is probably be foreign to most readers, and this shows no deficiency on their part. By and large, Alkan has been forgotten. Much of the blame for this unfortunate fact lies squarely with Alkan himself, whose introversion and cynicism lead him to lead much of his mature life in self-imposed seclusion. He spent, for instance, a 25 year period of his adult life without giving a public performance, despite being one of history's greatest pianists. He did little in his lifetime to popularize his own work, which lead him to be neglected by the concert-going public. When he died in 1888, an obituary in Le menestrel quipped: "Alkan has just died. It was necessary for him to die in order to suspect his existence."

    Alkan's career as a pianist and composer was most active during the middle half of the 19th century, making him contemporaneous with both Chopin and Liszt, to whom Alkan can aptly be compared. All three composers were pianists writing primarily for the piano, and all three generated an incredibly varied and imaginative body of work. In the corpora of Chopin, Liszt, and Alkan we find compositions of breathtaking and delicate sensitivity situated alongside thunderous epics which place extreme technical demands upon the pianist daring enough to attempt their performance. Relevantly, all three also published influential, highly original sets of etudes, pieces of music which emphasize particular technical skills on the part of the musician performing them. Of these, Chopin's etudes (Op. 12 and 25) were published first (in the 1830's), and they marked a radically new approach to piano playing and composition. Far from being mere practice exercises, Chopin's etudes were worthy of aesthetic contemplation as ends in themselves, quite apart from the workout they gave the performer. Liszt also published a collection of fiendishly difficult etudes - his Transcendental Etudes - which, along with Chopin's, remain a staple of the traditional repertoire of concert pianists.

    In contrast, Alkan's "Douze etudes dans tous les tons mineurs" (Twelve studies in the minor keys, Op. 39 [1857]) have failed to be regularly featured in live performances. Part of the explanation of this phenomenon is doubtless Alkan's obscurity amongst the listening public; pianists will not often program music that the public does not want to come hear. But over and above this, the 12 etudes which constitute Alkan's Op.39 are some of the most ferociously difficult pieces in the piano literature. Taken together, Op.39 includes - amongst other things - an overture, a symphony, a concerto, and a set of theme and variations - all written for the piano alone. Of these, the symphony and concerto offer perhaps the richest pianistic experiences for the listener.

    At this point, I must pause my discussion of Alkan and discuss for a moment one of my personal heroes, Marc-Andre Hamelin. Hamelin is, in my opinion, the greatest living pianist. Certainly he is the greatest living technician; his preternatural virtuosity often draws comparisons with Liszt himself (whose technique was indeed transcendental). But over and above Hamelin's sheer ability to play, he possesses an artistic intellect which matches the power and speed of his hands; for Hamelin, virtuosity is merely a means to breathe life into the composer's score, not a showboating end in itself. As a result of these remarkable qualities, Hamelin is able to masterfully perform not only dazzling virtuoso crowd-pleasers, but also the more restrained and delicate music of composers like Haydn, Albeniz, and Debussy. This is apparent if one listens to any Hamelin CD release; his recorded body of work occupies that rarefied air where superlatives fail.

    When it comes to Alkan recordings, Hamelin has few peers and arguably no equals. While it is ultimately a matter of taste and preference whether one prefers Hamelin's Alkan releases to those of Jack Gibbons, John Ogdon, or Ronald Smith, I find the call easy to make. Where others sometimes struggle to clearly render Alkan's denser, more complex passages, Hamelin glides through with seemingly effortless aplomb. His boundless pianistic abilities overcome all barriers between the composer's score and the listener's ear in ways that can call into question what one previously regarded as humanly possible. This last claim may strike some as hyperbolic, but it is nevertheless sincere.

    The best evidence for this bold claim comes from the experience of listening to Hamelin's CD releases themselves - an experience for which there is no real substitute (short of seeing him live). The short snippets of Alkan's Symphony for Solo Piano and Concerto for Solo Piano available on the Hyperion Records website are far too brief to properly appreciate the genius of either Hamelin or Alkan. But to give you a glimpse of how awesome the Hamelin/Alkan combination is, below are the two most badass videos you'll see on YouTube today.

    The first is the fourth movement finale of Alkan's Symphony from Op.39. This work is symphonic in that it is designed to evoke the sense of hearing a full orchestra, replete with cellos, violins, woodwinds and all the rest. The piece is especially demanding on the performer, not just because he must struggle to play the right notes at the right times, but because he must also strive to bring out the subtle textures and inner voices that correspond to the different orchestral parts. I'll let you be the judge as to how well Hamelin succeeds:



    The second video also features a selection from Op.39, the first movement of Alkan's Concerto for Solo Piano. Like the Symphony, the Concerto was concieved of orchestrally, with all the parts of the symphony represented in the score. But the Concerto outdoes the Symphony (which is no mean feat!) by introducing a solo part in addition to the orchestral elements. That's right, folks, it's the orchestra and soloist together, written for a single instrument and a single performer. The result is nothing short of astonishing. (Be sure to fasten your seatbelts before the climax kicks in around 5:35) :



    The first movement alone of this massive concerto lasts for nearly half an hour (of which the above video is simply the final third), and there are still two more movements to follow. Taken as a whole, Alkan's concerto (to say nothing of Op.39, of which it is simply a part) is a stupendous triumph whose finale will have your heart in your throat and your jaw on the floor. I still find it difficult not to leap into applause at the end, even when listening in the privacy of my own home. I'd urge any self-described lover of piano music (or classical music in general) to pick up a copy of the concerto for themselves. If what you seek from music is a glorious and exalted reminder of what it is open for human beings to achieve, few things satisfy like Alkan in the hands of Hamelin. And for those of you whose musical tastes preclude the pianistic, buy a copy for your friend or loved one who does enjoy this type of music. They're guaranteed to be delighted.

    Read more...

    Sunday, December 14, 2008

    Recap #22

    By Diana Hsieh

    This week on Politics without God, the blog of the Coalition for Secular Government:

    And this week on We Stand FIRM, the blog of FIRM: Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine:

    Read more...

    Sunday Open Thread #27

    By Diana Hsieh

    Here's yet another a Sunday Open Thread for your thoughts:

    For anyone in the fiery grip of a random question, comment, joke, or link they'd like to share with NoodleFood readers, I hereby open up the comments on this post to any respectable topic. (Please refrain from posting personal attacks, pornographic material, and commercial solicitations.)

    Read more...

    Saturday, December 13, 2008

    The Effect of Laying Off Carbs

    By Greg Perkins

    Last week I mentioned mending my high-carb ways. Tammy's been documenting my progress in swimsuit photos -- sorry, half-naked middle-aged-man alert! -- and since I wasn't thinking there was much of a difference so far, she dug into her archive today to show me the contrast between now and two and a half months ago. (click to zoom in, if you dare)

    Yep, it turns out that making meals of whole bags of tortilla chips with sugary margaritas wasn't helping. But more important, I simply feel better!

    Read more...

    FA/RM

    By Diana Hsieh

    I'm delighted to report that Dr. Monica Hughes recently launched Free Agriculture - Restore Markets (FA/RM) -- a new organization devoted to promoting "agricultural and health policies based solely on the principles of individual rights." Check out the web site including the goals of the organization, opportunities for activism, and readings on rights. Also, be sure to bookmark the blog.

    Until quite recently, I was almost entirely ignorant of the nature and extent of the government controls on agriculture and food production. Sure, I'd heard vague tidbits here and there, but I didn't realize the breadth and depth of the sheer insanity until I began doing just a wee bit of digging for myself, often with Monica's help.

    The simple fact is that the pursuit of one's life, health, and happiness requires a government that respects and upholds the rights of property and contract in all aspects of food production, distribution, and consumption. We have nothing of the sort in America today. The rights of individuals (i.e. producers and consumers) are utterly disregarded by the state -- often in ways that border on a police state (e.g. see here, here, and here). The growing alarming about "carbon emissions" threatens to unleash even more life-threatening statist controls. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

    Our daily sustenance is in peril.

    Visit FA/RM for more.

    Read more...

    Happy Happy Birthday!

    By Diana Hsieh

    Today, I turn 34 years old. So...

    Happy Happy Birthday!
    Happy Birthday to Me!
    Happy Happy Birthday!
    Happy Birthday to Me!

    I have a busy day of dissertation writing to do, then Paul and I will enjoy dinner and discussion of The Fountainhead with our friends of 1FROG.

    Read more...

    Friday, December 12, 2008

    House!

    By Diana Hsieh

    HAHAHA: Write your own House episode.

    Read more...

    Dog in Snow

    By Diana Hsieh

    Kate always loved the snow, but she never managed to love it this much:



    (Via my mom and Tim Sandefur)

    Read more...

    The Truth About Semi-Automatic Firearms

    By Paul Hsieh

    This video by San Jose police officer Leroy Pyle provides an excellent demonstration of the difference between "semi-automatic" and "automatic" firearms:

    "The Truth About Semi-Auto Firearms"



    In particular, Officer Pyle does an excellent job of showing that two guns can have nearly identical inessential cosmetic features (such as the material the stock is made of), but differ in this one essential feature (semi-automatic vs. automatic), making them fundamentally different guns. Conversely, two guns can have the same essential features (i.e., both be semi-automatic), but one can be made to look very menacing and the other very innocuous simply by changing a few inessential cosmetic features.

    In my experience, there are even some Objectivists who lack this basic understanding of the difference between automatic vs. semi-automatic weapons.

    This is a nice real-life example of the importance of good epistemology, and in particular of defining by essentials. And we can see the dangers of failing to define by essentials when policy makers talk about banning "assault weapons", which is a bogus concept created grouping together firearms based on these inessential cosmetic features, rather than the essential ones.

    Even now, there are some Republican Congressmen (not Democrats) who wish to reinstate the expired "Assault Weapons Ban" based on precisely this bogus concept. And given the incoming Obama Administration, this bill may become law.

    As a corollary, this is also a concrete example of why a proper defense of one's political freedoms depends on upholding a proper rational epistemology -- and more generally a proper objective philosophy. Fortunately, that epistemology and that broader overall philosophy is already available to us -- we just have to be willing to use it.

    (Video link via Howard Roerig.)

    Read more...

    Thursday, December 11, 2008

    Old Castro = New Castro

    By Diana Hsieh

    Remember this report from the Human Rights Foundation (which I support) next time you hear a leftist sing the praises of Cuba:

    Cuba: Rights Activists Assaulted, Beaten, and Detained by Castro Government

    At least 20 activists were detained in Cuba this week for planning to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). According to independent and verifiable sources inside Cuba, detainees, some of who were taken by force and beaten, include former political prisoners, human rights activists, opposition political leaders, and independent journalists.

    "The government of Raul Castro is arresting human rights advocates for wanting to celebrate a declaration of human rights--it's business as usual, the new boss is the same as the old boss," said Sarah Wasserman, Chief Operating Officer of the Human Rights Foundation. "For a country that denies violating human rights, this is the epitome of hypocrisy; it's evident that the Cuban government's signing of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to notable pomp, circumstance, and self-congratulation earlier this year was just window-dressing."
    I'm not surprised.

    Read more...

    Link-O-Rama

    By Diana Hsieh

  • Who Is To Blame?: Yaron Brook interviewed in Newsweek. Here's the final question and answer:
    With free markets now in disrepute, what's going to happen to the popularity of Ayn Rand's most famous book, "Atlas Shrugged"?

    I think it's going to go up dramatically. I think it already has. [People] are saying, "We're heading toward socialism, we're heading toward more regulation." "Atlas Shrugged" is coming true. How do we get out? How do we escape? Unfortunately, there is no escape. Businessmen are panicking, and I think they should be panicking. Many of them understand that this was not a crisis of free markets. There was no free market to fail. What we have is a regulated market, and the regulated market has failed.
  • What capitalists need to understand: Alex Epstein blogs at the London Telegraph. You can comment.

  • The Magic of Photoshop: Watch a revoltingly fat ass transformed into something lovely before your very eyes.

  • Welcome to Equestria: A spot-on and damn funny response to Dinesh D'Souza's stupid argument that athiests shouldn't be concerned about the religious beliefs of other people if God doesn't exist.

  • 10 useful iPhone tips & tricks: I was totally unaware of some of these delights.

    Read more...
  • Advice on Objectivist Groups

    By Diana Hsieh

    Back in November, Amy Nasir posted some good advice for people looking to create a local Objectivist group. Based on my experience with the highly successful Front Range Objectivism, I think such groups should focus on discussing Objectivism -- particularly essays by Ayn Rand -- with the goal of understanding how the principles of the philosophy apply to their own lives.

    Such groups have three major benefits, in my view:

    1. They can help people deepen their understanding of Objectivism. Personally, I find it enormously helpful to be committed to reading and discussing two or three essays by Ayn Rand (or another other Objectivist philosopher) each month in FROG. I learn something new each time I do that, and I know I'm not alone.

    2. They can be a great resources for friendships with like-minded people. Paul and I have a really fantastic slew of friends in Colorado, almost all found through FROG. Not everyone has been fantastic, but the few real duds have made themselves scarce.

    3. They can be a springboard for local activism. Not everyone in a discussion group will become an activist. But a few might be inspired to do so in a serious way, and some others might be willing and able to contribute on occasion. And given #1, they'll have the requisite knowledge to do that relatively well.
    If you want to see how we conduct our FROG meetings, see this page.

    Read more...

    Wednesday, December 10, 2008

    Objectivist Roundup

    By Diana Hsieh

    Nick Provenzo of Rule of Reason has the latest Objectivist Roundup. Go check it out!

    Read more...

    All Cats Are Weird

    By Diana Hsieh

    All cats are weird. These two are just a wee bit extra weird:



    Read more...

    WAAA!!!! Take Care of Me!

    By Gina Liggett

    When I hear of some new government program that's made available courtesy of working, tax-paying citizens and businesses, I'm left stunned in a state of resentful disbelief. But our government -- of the free and brave -- provides benefits in the areas of career development, child care, counseling, disability, disaster relief, education and training, food and nutrition, energy assistance, scholarships and grants, health care, housing, insurance, living assistance, loans, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and tax assistance.

    Well, that pretty much covers food, clothing, and shelter... wait a minute, no mention of clothing. Oh well.

    Since I currently receive no welfare benefits because I work for a living and buy everything I need and then also pay taxes (like millions of other Americans), I wondered what governmental benefits I could receive anyway. So I took a little on-line quiz at govbenefits.com.

    After answering questions about my age, profession, education, veteran status, disabilities, needs I have, etc., I discovered that I would be potentially eligible for 17 government programs! Most of these were for the opportunity to use my educational and professional background to do research in the biological sciences. But I also might qualify for some HUD (Housing and Urban Development) benefits. My favorites, though, were two exciting opportunities, the Prose and Poetry Fellowship and the National Ocean Service Intern Program. Maybe I could combine the two somehow by taking a government-sponsored cruise and write a novel!

    It was a dreary and foreboding moment for Juliet as she pondered tearfully with heaving and panting breaths, her longing for Sven, her long-lost beau of an era swept away by the wind which whipped the willows in a wild winter when wondrous wanderings of the heart did happen.
    Hey, I could dig it.

    Then I wondered what I could get if I decided to quit working, quit paying for health insurance and had $45 dollars in my savings account. I would quality for 32 government programs in my state! Not only would I potentially quality for the Special Milk Program but also the Colorado Summer Food Service program. I'm not sure how as a middle-aged woman those school-based programs would apply to me, but maybe it's because women are recommended to get lots of calcium in their diet.

    But certainly I could qualify for more than that. So I re-took the quiz and claimed to be a "practicing artist." Hey! I practice my dance steps everyday! I also added that I have an Injury or Illness because the other day I got this nasty hamstring pull from practicing so much. And I also put in my claim to have a "difference of limb length" because I'm pretty sure that my right leg is 1/17th millimeter longer than the left. I added that I would like Mental Health Services because I've been so distraught over the U.S. socialist revolution that happened on November 4. I would also like some Women's Health Care. Oh, also, I answered "yes" to the question, "Do you feel that you've been denied housing or financial assistance due to discrimination." I'm awfully sure that I feel that somewhere along the line I been discriminated against.

    Guest what? 37 programs! Oh my gosh! Lots of housing assistance. Food stamps. Health care. Architectural Barrier Act Enforcement (that's probably because of my limb length difference). Energy assistance. Short-term lending. Job opportunities for low-income persons (hey! I don't want a job!). Weatherization Assistance for Low-income persons (now, THAT, I could use).

    And I would only have to jettison maybe that one Objectivist virtue of "independence" to get my goodies. But hey, as our presidential candidates reminded us, this is the country of sacrifice, right?

    Tara Smith in her book, "Ayn Rand's Normative Ethics: The Virtuous Egoist," presents Ayn Rand's definition of the virtue of independence: "one's acceptance of the responsibility of forming one's own judgements and living by the work of one's own mind." Tara Smith adds,
    More colloquially, it is a matter of making one's own way in the world. The independent person supports himself both intellectually and materially, thinking for himself and taking productive action to sustain himself.
    As an individual becomes an adult, a psychological milestone of independence is supposed to occur. This is a time when children separate from their parents who cared and provided for them; they strike out their own, choose a career or job, form new social relationships, and pursue their values. Our welfare-minded society enables the dependency of many of its adult citizens, leaving them in a perpetual state of adolescence, unable to survive without sacrificing others to meet their endless needs.

    I've decided after all not to apply for that government-sponsored cruise to become a novelist (although, I hate to deprive the world of my prose). But a society that sacrifices its citizens so that others don't have to grow up is an immoral society.

    And despite the so-called good intentions of politicians and interest groups who come up with these care-taking programs, they are no different than the parents who enable their unemployed 30-year-old offspring to live at home for free and play video games all day long.

    The virtue of independence is a requirement for survival as a moral being. Only in an individual-rights-respecting society, where there is no sacrifice of some to pay for the dependency of others, can the virtue of independence manifest to its fullest potential -- a benevolent society of individuals left free to pursue their happiness.

    So for now I'll keep my job and work on that novel on my free time. (I know you can hardly wait for me to finish it!)

    Read more...

    Back to TOP