A daily dose of philosophical food for your noodle... bacon for your brain!

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Preview: Philosophy in Action Webcast

By Diana Hsieh

In my live Philosophy in Action Webcast on Sunday morning, I'll answer questions on consent in sex, terminating online versus in-person acquaintances, compensating the victims of a your negligence, the meaning of faith, and more. Please join us for this hour of lively discussion, where we apply rational principles to the challenges of living virtuous, happy, and free lives!

  • What: Live Philosophy in Action Webcast

  • Who: Diana Hsieh (Ph.D, Philosophy) and Greg Perkins

  • When: Sunday, 26 February 2012 at 8 am PT / 9 am MT / 10 am CT / 11 am ET

  • Where: www.PhilosophyInAction.com/live
Here are the questions that I'll answer this week:
  • Question 1: Consent in Sex: What constitutes consent in sex? Can a person give tacit consent by his or her actions? Is explicit consent required for some sex acts? Once consent has been given, when and how can a person withdraw that consent? Does the legal perspective on these questions differ from the moral perspective?

  • Question 2: Terminating Online Versus In-Person Acquaintances: What's the proper threshold for cutting off a digital versus in-person acquaintance? Morally, when it is wrong to end your friendly interactions with an in-person acquaintance? And when is it wrong not to do so? Does the answer differ for a digital acquaintance – meaning, for example, someone that you know only via Facebook?

  • Question 3: Compensating the Victims of a Your Negligence: What should you do for a person that you injured in a car accident that was your fault? Does a person have moral obligations – over and above any legal obligations – to the victim, since the accident was due to your own carelessness or mistake?

  • Question 4: The Meaning of Faith: Is it wrong to use "faith" to mean "trust and confidence in a person"? Some people talk about having "faith" in their friends or in themselves – and by that, they mean that they trust and have confidence in those people. Is it wrong to use "faith" in that way? In other words, blind faith is wrong, but is all faith blind faith?
After that, we'll do a round of totally impromptu "Rapid Fire Questions."

If you can't attend the live webcast, you can listen to these webcasts later as audio-only podcasts by subscribing to the NoodleCast RSS feed:
Be sure to connect with us on social media too.

You can listen to full episodes or just selected questions from any past episode in the Webcast Archive. Also, don't forget to submit and vote on the questions that you'd most like me to answer from the ongoing Question Queue.

I hope to see you on Sunday morning!

Read more...

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Clemson Institute: Summer Conference for Students

By Diana Hsieh

Attention, students!

The Clemson Institute for the Study of Capitalism is happy to announce its sixth annual Summer Conference for Students, titled Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged and the Moral Foundations of Capitalism. We're accepting applications now. The conference will feature an in-depth analysis of Rand's magnum opus and explore the following questions:
  • What is the moral basis for a free market?
  • How to individual rights function in a capitalist society?
  • What does the history of capitalism teach us about its moral basis?
  • How is Ayn Rand's view of capitalism unique?
The conference features lectures by Craig Biddle, Eric Daniels, Richard Ebeling, and Andrew Bernstein as well as special guest to be announced soon.

The conference will take place on the Clemson University campus from May 24 - 28th. Scholarships are available to qualified undergraduate and graduate students, including housing, meals, and a travel stipend. For more information and to apply, visit the 2012 conference website or use the contact form. Testimony from conference alumni, video highlights, and an FAQ are also available.

The deadline to apply is March 1, 2012.
Here is the web site for the conference and the form to apply. It's free, and travel stipends are available.

Read more...

My Reply to Joe's Diner

By Diana Hsieh

Undoubtedly, I was a bit snippy in my reply here. But... if you e-mail me to promote "Joe's Diner located across for the Post Office," and said post office is located in Ohio, you can expect a bit of snip in my reply!

Read more...

Monday, February 20, 2012

Me, Filtered Though the Latest Facebook Meme

By Diana Hsieh

As my FaceBook friends saw yesterday, Trey Givens made an awesome version of that painfully common Facebook meme:


It's missing the standard heading of "What she thinks she does." For that, I'm not sure whether I'd need a picture of Jean Grey as Phoenix from the X-Men or a Jean-Luc Picard facepalm. Maybe... Jean Grey doing a facepalm!

Read more...

NoodleCast #118: Live Philosophy in Action Webcast

By Diana Hsieh

On Sunday, 19 February 2012, I broadcast a new episode of my live Philosophy in Action Webcast, where I answer questions on the application of rational principles to the challenges of living a virtuous, happy, and free life in a live, hour-long webcast. The webcast is broadcast live every Sunday morning at 8 am PT / 9 am MT / 10 am CT / 11 am ET. In the webcast, I broadcast on video, Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers is on audio, and the audience is in a text chat.

As usual, if you can't attend the live webcast, you can listen to it later as audio-only podcast by subscribing to the NoodleCast RSS Feed:

You can also peruse the archives, listening to whole episodes or just individual questions. The archives are sorted by date and by topic.

We hope that you'll join the live webcast, because that's more lively and engaging than the podcast. People talk merrily in the text chat while watching the webcast. Greg and I enjoy the immediate feedback of a live audience – the funny quips, serious comments, and follow-up questions. So please join the live webcast when you can!

The Podcast: Episode: 19 February 2012

Listen Now

    Duration: 1:08:17
Download the Episode
Subscribe to the Feed
The Segments: Episode: 19 February 2012

The following segments are marked as chapters in the M4A version of the podcast. Thanks to Tammy Perkins for helping compile the show notes!

Introduction (0:00)

I visited my sister early this week, and now Trey Givens is visiting us!

Question 1: Judging Religions as Better and Worse (2:29)

Are some religions better than others? Do certain religions encourage rationality more than others? Do some promote better moral systems than others? I am curious both about different forms of Christianity (Catholic, Protestant, Unitarian, Mormon, etc.), as well as other religions (Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Baha'i, etc.). Should rational atheists respect followers of certain religions more than others?

My Answer, In Brief: Religions are better or worse in their core doctrines and in their effects on a culture. However, due to the complexity of religions – not merely as ideologies but also as a cultural movements – they can't be easily judged as better or worse. Also, just because a person claims to be an adherent of a given religion doesn't tell much about what he believes or practices, nor whether they are honest.

Question 2: Telling a Friend about Romantic Feelings (22:58)

Am I obliged to tell a friend that I've developed romantic feelings towards her? Recently, I've developed romantic feelings for a platonic friend. Is it dishonest to withhold this information from her and just continue our friendship? What should I do if she asks me a direct question about my feelings? When would it be wrong to withhold this information from her, if ever?

My Answer, In Brief: It's not wrong to keep your feelings to yourself, but lying about them can cause serious harm to your character and your friendship.

Links:
Question 3: Overfeeding a Child as Abuse (30:51)

Is overfeeding a child a form of abuse? In November, county officials in Ohio placed a third-grade child into foster care on the grounds that he's over 200 pounds and his mother isn't doing enough to control his weight. (See the news story.) The boy does not currently have any serious medical problems: he's merely at risk for developing diabetes, hypertension, etc. The county worked with the mother for a year before removing the child, and it claims that her actions constitute medical neglect. Now his mother is only permitted to see him once per week for two hours. Did the state overreach its proper authority in removing the child from his home?

My Answer, In Brief: The state should only remove children from their parents when the parents are violating the rights of the child by inflicting permanent physical or psychological harm. This case of supposed overfeeding does not qualify, not by a long shot.

Question 4: Interest in a Lover's Writings (42:22)

Should a person always be interested in the creative works of a romantic interest or lover? I'm romantically interested in a woman who writes as her career. While my admiration of her is based in her virtues and even heroic qualities, I'm don't find the subjects of her writing to be particularly interesting. If I were to begin dating this woman, should I read everything that she's written and writes?

My Answer, In Brief: It's strange to be so uninterested in another person's work at the outset of a relationship. You should be interested in your lover or spouse's interests, not always for their own sake, but because your lover or spouse matters to you.

Rapid Fire Questions (49:29)

In this segment, I answered a variety of questions off-the-cuff. The questions were:
  • Should abused kids become wards of the State?

  • Where do the GOP presidential candidates stand on issues that gays might care about?

  • Is there a rational basis or explanation for "intuition?"

  • Is tax evasion or tax fraud morally wrong? What about hiding one's money in foreign banks?

  • Are movies and TV getting better or worse over the years? What does that indicate about our cultural trends?

  • Does social media benefit introverts or extroverts more?

  • Is Objectivism some kind of cult?
Conclusion (1:07:02)

Comments or questions? Contact us!
Support the Webcast

The Philosophy in Action Webcast is available to anyone, free of charge. We love doing it, but it's not free for us to produce: it requires our time, effort, and money. So if you enjoy and value what we're doing, please contribute to the webcast's tip jar!





If you'd like to make a one-time contribution in an amount not listed, use this link. For instructions on canceling or revising your monthly contribution, visit the support page.

Thank you, if you've contributed to the webcast! You make our work possible every week, and we're so grateful for that! Also, whether you're able to contribute financially or not, we always appreciate your helping us spread the word about this webcast to anyone you think might be interested, as well as submitting and voting on questions for upcoming webcasts.

Read more...

Sunday, February 19, 2012

Activism Recap

By Diana Hsieh

This week on We Stand FIRM, the blog of FIRM (Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine):

This week on Mother of Exiles:
This week on the blog of Modern Paleo:

Read more...

Open Thread #332

By Diana Hsieh

Nature


For anyone wishing to ask a question, make a observation, or share a link with other NoodleFood readers, I hereby open up the comments on this post to any respectable topic. As always, please refrain from posting inappropriate comments such as personal attacks, pornographic material, copyrighted material, and commercial solicitations.

NoodleFood's Open Threads feature creative commons photographs from Flickr that I find interesting. I hope that you enjoy them!

Read more...

Saturday, February 18, 2012

Modern Paleo in The Daily Camera

By Diana Hsieh

The paleo diet was recently the subject of an article in Boulder's newspaper, The Daily Camera: Paleo diet advocates claim increased energy, health benefits. Very unexpectedly, Modern Paleo was mentioned!

With more than 90 active members, the Denver paleo group on Meetup.com provides a way for paleo dieters to connect, support each other and share tips. In Boulder, more than 45 people are on a waiting list anticipating the start of a similar group. With the objective of creating an online community, University of Colorado graduate Diana Hsieh started ModernPaleo.com.
The article is pretty good, as much as I groan at the paleo "pancakes" featured in the opening and the closing.

Read more...

Friday, February 17, 2012

Link-O-Rama

By Diana Hsieh

Read more...

CU Boulder Think! Lecture: Should You Try to Be Morally Perfect?

By Diana Hsieh

I'm super-excited to announce that I'll be giving a lecture for CU Boulder's Think! philosophy lecture series on March 6th. The lecture will be held in the theater of Old Main, from 7:30 to 9:00 pm. The title of my lecture is: "Should You Try to Be Morally Perfect?" Here's the abstract and my bio:

Most people dismiss any ideal of moral perfection as beyond their reach. "I'm only human," they say. That view is a legacy of Christianity, which teaches that moral perfection is possible to God alone and that any attempt at moral perfection is the sin of pride. In sharp contrast, Ayn Rand argues that moral perfection is not only possible to ordinary people, but also necessary for anyone who wants to live a virtuous and happy life. Hence, pride, understood as moral ambitiousness, is one of her seven major virtues -- as seen in the heroes of her novels "The Fountainhead" and "Atlas Shrugged."

This talk will explore Ayn Rand's views of moral perfection, ambition, and pride. What does she think that morality demands? How can people achieve that? How should people respond to their own moral wrongs and errors? We will compare Rand's answers to these questions to those of Aristotle. We will find that, despite some differences in each philosopher's conception of virtue, they share the compelling view that seeking moral perfection is crucially important to a person's life and happiness.

Diana Hsieh received her Ph.D in philosophy from the CU Boulder in 2009. Her dissertation argued that Thomas Nagel's "problem of moral luck" can be solved by an Aristotelian theory of moral responsibility. She is the author of the Explore Atlas Shrugged series of podcasts and discussion questions. Every Sunday morning, she answers questions on practical ethics in her live Philosophy in Action Webcast.
These questions about moral perfection have long been of interest to me, and I'm really enthused to explore them in greater depth -- particularly because I think that the comparison between Ayn Rand and Aristotle will be really quite illuminating.

If you're a local, please attend in person! Bring a friend! Spread the word! If you can't attend, I might be able to post a recording of the lecture afterwards.

Read more...

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Video: Liking But Not Loving Your Career

By Diana Hsieh

In Sunday's Philosophy in Action Webcast, I discussed liking but not loving your career. The question was:

What should I do if I have a good job but not burning professional ambition? I have a good job that pays well. I perform my job well to the best of my ability. But I don't feel about it the same way that Howard Roark felt about the field of architecture in The Fountainhead or that Dagny felt about the railroad business in Atlas Shrugged. I don't hate my job – I do enjoy the work and the people I work with. But it's not my burning passion. On a scale of 1-to-10, my paying job (and the overall field) is a 7, but I also have various non-paying outside hobbies and activities that are more of a 8 or 9 for me. Should I try to cultivate a strong passion for my paying job? Or look for a different line of work? Or ramp up my pursuit of various hobbies and outside activities that give me greater satisfaction on the side?
My answer, in brief:
A person's work should serve his life, and sometimes that means choosing the one career that you're wildly passionate about, and sometimes that means choosing a career that you enjoy, but that enables you to pursue other values.
Here's the video of my full answer:
If you enjoy the video, please "like" it on YouTube and share it with friends via social media, forums, and e-mail! You can also throw a bit of extra love in our tip jar.

Join the next Philosophy in Action Webcast on Sunday at 8 am PT / 9 am MT / 10 am CT / 11 am ET at www.PhilosophyInAction.com/live.

In the meantime, Connect with Us via social media, e-mail, RSS feeds, and more. Check out the Webcast Archives, where you can listen to the full webcast or just selected questions from any past episode, and our my YouTube channel. And go to the Question Queue to submit and vote on questions for upcoming webcast episodes.

Read more...

Jane Eyre

By Diana Hsieh

Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre is one of my personal favorites in literature, and I'd rank it somewhere in the top ten of all literature.

On Christmas Eve and Christmas Day, I gave myself the gift of watching my favorite of all the movie/miniseries versions of Jane Eyre, namely this version by Masterpiece Theater. The omissions from and changes to the plot are minor, and the characters of Jane and Mr. Rochester are perfectly written and acted by Ruth Wilson and Toby Stephens. It was such a delight to watch again, and I highly recommend it, whether you've read the book or not.

(I did like the recent movie adaptation, but I didn't think the characters were nearly as well-portrayed.)

Read more...

Objectivist Roundup

By Diana Hsieh

The Objectivist Roundup is a weekly blog carnival for Objectivists. Contributors must be Objectivists, but posts on any topic are welcome.

Rule of Reason hosted this week's Objectivist Roundup. Go take a look!

You can submit your blog article to the next edition of The Objectivist Roundup using this submission form. Past posts and future hosts can be found here. If you're an Objectivist blogger, you can get weekly reminders to submit to the carnival by subscribing to OBloggers @ OList.com.

Also, here are the ten most recent additions to the question queue for the Philosophy in Action Webcast. Please vote for the questions that you're most interested in hearing me answer!


Join us for the live webcast at www.PhilosophyInAaction.com on Sundays at 8 am PT / 9 am MT / 10 am CT / 11 am ET. In the meantime, check out the show's extensive archives by topic, peruse the upcoming question queue, and submit your own questions.

Read more...

Preview: Philosophy in Action Webcast

By Diana Hsieh

In my live Philosophy in Action Webcast on Sunday morning, I'll answer questions on better and worse religions, telling a friend about romantic feelings, overfeeding a child as abuse, interest in a lover's writings, and more. Please join us for this hour of lively discussion, where we apply rational principles to the challenges of living virtuous, happy, and free lives!

  • What: Live Philosophy in Action Webcast

  • Who: Diana Hsieh (Ph.D, Philosophy) and Greg Perkins

  • When: Sunday, 19 February 2012 at 8 am PT / 9 am MT / 10 am CT / 11 am ET

  • Where: www.PhilosophyInAction.com/live
Here are the questions that I'll answer this week:
  • Question 1: Better and Worse Religions: Are some religions better than others? Do certain religions encourage rationality more than others? Do some promote better moral systems than others? I am curious both about different forms of Christianity (Catholic, Protestant, Unitarian, Mormon, etc.), as well as other religions (Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Baha'i, etc.). Should rational atheists respect followers of certain religions more than others?

  • Question 2: Telling a Friend about Romantic Feelings: Am I obliged to tell a friend that I've developed romantic feelings towards her? Recently, I've developed romantic feelings for a platonic friend. Is it dishonest to withhold this information from her and just continue our friendship? What should I do if she asks me a direct question about my feelings? When would it be wrong to withhold this information from her, if ever?

  • Question 3: Overfeeding a Child as Abuse: Is overfeeding a child a form of abuse? In November, county officials in Ohio placed a third-grade child into foster care on the grounds that he's over 200 pounds and his mother isn't doing enough to control his weight. (See the news story.) The boy does not currently have any serious medical problems: he's merely at risk for developing diabetes, hypertension, etc. The county worked with the mother for a year before removing the child, and it claims that her actions constitute medical neglect. Now his mother is only permitted to see him once per week for two hours. Did the state overreach its proper authority in removing the child from his home?

  • Question 4: Interest in a Lover's Writings: Should a person always be interested in the creative works of a romantic interest or lover? I'm romantically interested in a woman who writes as her career. While my admiration of her is based in her virtues and even heroic qualities, I'm don't find the subjects of her writing to be particularly interesting. If I were to begin dating this woman, should I read everything that she's written and writes?
After that, we'll do a round of totally impromptu "Rapid Fire Questions."

If you can't attend the live webcast, you can listen to these webcasts later as audio-only podcasts by subscribing to the NoodleCast RSS feed:
Be sure to connect with us on social media too.

You can listen to full episodes or just selected questions from any past episode in the Webcast Archive. Also, don't forget to submit and vote on the questions that you'd most like me to answer from the ongoing Question Queue.

I hope to see you on Sunday morning!

Read more...

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

January 2012 OActivist Compilation

By Tammy

Here is a list of items published by members of the OActivists @ OList.com e-mail list for January 2012:

Op-Eds

1. Paul Hsieh, "The Truth About RomneyCare", PJMedia, January 7, 2012.

2. Paul Hsieh, "Why is Creating Value Good, Profits Bad?", Real Clear Markets, January 17, 2012.

3. Paul Hsieh, "SOPA, Guns, and Freedom", PJMedia, January 19, 2012.

Letters to the Editors

1. Linn & Ari Armstrong, "Take responsibility when carrying a gun", Grand Junction Free Press, January 6, 2012.

2. Paul Hsieh, "Accountable care organizations" would backfire"", DenverPost, January 14, 2012.

3. Amesh A. Adalja, "Question failed drug war", Butler Eagle, January 14, 2012.

4. Amesh A. Adalja, "No place for zoning", Pittsburgh Tribune Review, January 16, 2012.

5. Amesh A. Adalja, re same-sex marriage, Pittsburgh City Paper, January 18, 2012.

6. Linn & Ari Armstrong, "Law scholar brings 'Original Constitution' to Colorado activists", Grand Junction Free Press, January 20, 2012.

7. Amesh A. Adalja, "Conclusion Incorrect", Butler Eagle, January 21, 2012.

8. Mike LaFerrara, "What about worker greed", NJ Star Ledger, January 21, 2012.

This compilation does not include personal or Objectivist blog posts, web comments, letters to politicians, radio show call-ins, videos, etc., all of which actively spread our message and advance our goals. Please contact me privately if your published item was inadvertently left off the compilation, or if you have any administrative questions or issues.

Read more...

The Age of Ships

By Paul Hsieh

The August 2011 City Journal featured a fascinating article entitled, "The Age of Ships, subtitled, "A time before passenger jets, when ocean liners were 'the greatest of the works of man'".

Author Michael Anton covered the history and technology behind the luxury ocean liners in the era after Titanic, before airplanes displaced ships as the dominant means of passenger travel across the Atlantic Ocean. The competition between commercial lines was fierce, especially to be able to cite the fastest Trans-Atlantic crossing times.

There are lots of interesting tidbits, but I especially liked the story Vladimir Yourkevitch, who fled Russia after the Communist takeover and had to take a job in France as a riveter in the Renault factory. The image of an immigrant factory worker trying to persuade the chairman of a major French shipyard that his revolutionary new ship hull design would work is something straight out of fiction. But it did indeed work, and that ship would later set one of the speed records.

(Read the full text of "The Age of Ships".)

Read more...

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

State of the OLists

By Diana Hsieh

Here's a few reminders from OList.com, starting with its thirteen (!!) OList e-mail lists:

  • OActivists: OActivists is an e-mail list for Objectivists committed to fostering positive cultural and political change. Its purpose is to encourage and assist effective advocacy of Objectivist ideas in non-Objectivist forums by facilitating communication between Objectivist activists. Membership is limited to Objectivist activists.
  • OLeaders: OLeaders is an e-mail list for the leaders and helpers of Objectivist organizations, particularly community groups and campus clubs. Its purpose is to facilitate the exchange of ideas about the effective creation, management, expansion, and promotion of Objectivist organizations and their events, as well as communicate announcements of likely interest. Membership is limited to Objectivists.
  • OBloggers: OBloggers is an e-mail list for Objectivist bloggers. Its purpose is to facilitate communication relevant to blogging, such as upcoming events, blogworthy links, posts of interest, blog promotion, and best blogging practices. Membership is limited to Objectivist bloggers.
  • OGrownups: OGrownups is an e-mail list for for Objectivists and others interested in raising and educating children well. Its purpose is to facilitate discussion amongst Objectivists about child development, discipline techniques, education methods, parenting resources, and more. Non-Objectivist lurkers are welcome.
  • OEvolve: OEvolve is an e-mail list for Objectivists and others interested in the proper application of evolutionary principles to diet, fitness, and health. Its purpose is to facilitate discussion about the practical sciences of cooking, nutrition, fitness, health, and more. Non-Objectivist lurkers are welcome.
  • OProducers: OProducers is an e-mail list for Objectivists and others committed to improving their habits of productivity in their careers, projects, and other pursuits. Its purpose is to facilitate discussion about practical methods for better management of time, projects, money, people, and other resources. Non-Objectivist lurkers are welcome.
  • OGeeks: OGeeks is an e-mail list for Objectivists and others interested in geeky topics like science, computing, engineering, mathematics, and technology. Its purpose is to facilitate discussion and sharing among Objectivists about all things geeky, such as best practices in programming, software reviews, scientific discoveries, educational resources, logic puzzles, technology trends, and geek comics. Non-Objectivist lurkers are welcome.
  • OHomos: OHomos is an mailing list for for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) Objectivists and others interested in the the proper application of reason, egoism, and rights to matters of mutual interest. Its purpose is to facilitate friendly discussion amongst GLBT Objectivists about dating, sexual health, social events, and "gay rights." Non-Objectivist GLBTs and non-GLBT Objectivists are welcome as lurkers.
  • OShooters: OShooters is an e-mail list for Objectivists and others enthused about firearms and committed to gun rights. Its purpose is to facilitate discussion about firearm models, shooting techniques, gun ranges, gun laws, and the like. Non-Objectivist lurkers are welcome.
  • OGardeners: OGardeners is an e-mail list for Objectivists and others interested in gardening and landscaping. Its purpose is to facilitate discussion about the cultivation of flowers, vegetables, shrubs, and trees. Non-Objectivist lurkers are welcome.
  • OCrafters: OCrafters is an e-mail list for Objectivists and others who engage in the production of crafts. Its purpose is to provide a forum for Objectivist crafters to ask each other questions, share useful advice and resources, and to brag about work in progress or completed. Non-Objectivist lurkers are welcome.
  • OAcademics: OAcademics is an e-mail list for Objectivist academics to discuss teaching, research, coursework, dissertations, job prospects, publication, and all other aspects of life in (or after) academia. Membership is limited to Objectivist academics.
  • OPeople: OPeople is an e-mail list for Objectivists and other OList subscribers to disseminate announcements about OList event, such as Movie Nights and Virtual Socials.
Also, OList hosts some online social events! The Tuesday evening Happy Hour chat is going strong, thanks to the efforts of Rose Wiegley. And Earl Parson has resumed the Saturday Movie Nights. To receive regular announcements of these events, please subscribe to OPeople.

Finally, OList keeps a Google Calendar of online Objectivist events. You can subscribe to it using XML or iCal formats. (Right click to copy the link URL, then copy that into your calendar program.)

That's all folks! And thanks so much to my fabulous slew of OList volunteers for making that possible!

Read more...

HP Calculators in 2025, As Predicated in 1978

By Paul Hsieh

In 1978, the HP Calculator Journal published a cute short story by science fiction writer Gordon Dickson entitled, "Thank You, Beep!"

It described a day in the life of a business traveler in the year 2025, armed with his trusty "HP XX-2050" handheld computer (which he nicknames "Beep"), capable of storing personal data, functioning as an "auto secretary" to make appointments, and interfacing with other machines through various "computer nets".

In retrospect, the predicted 1 GB of memory seems small by modern standards but was of course enormous by the standards of 1978.

The related article, "Smartphone futures -- Thank You, Beep...!" does a nice job comparing some of Dickson's other fictional predictions with current day reality.

The fictional HP XX-2050 is a bit chunkier than current smartphones:


But overall, Dickson did a pretty good job for someone writing in 1978.

I remember reading "Thank You, Beep!" when it was originally published, thinking how cool it would be to see something like that in real-life. Today's smartphones aren't quite there yet, but they're astonishingly close. And if current progress continues, they may well exceed Dickson's predictions by the time 2025 rolls around.

(Crossposted from GeekPress.)

Read more...

Monday, February 13, 2012

Vince Carroll on SuperPACs

By Diana Hsieh

Vince Carroll recently published an excellent column in the Denver Post in defense of free speech in elections... against the current hue and cry against SuperPACs. Here's a taste:

The primary examples of a Super PAC's handiwork that The Times bothered to mention in its "septic tanks" editorial were ads in Iowa by supporters of Mitt Romney "attacking Mr. Gingrich for his government lobbying and ethics violations." It's fine, you see, for The Times — a very big corporation indeed — to point out Newt Gingrich's "government lobbying and ethics violations" during the peak of a campaign, but let a few private individuals pool their money to make the same case in a negative ad and that is an intolerable state of affairs.
Go read the whole thing.

Read more...

NoodleCast #117: Live Philosophy in Action Webcast

By Diana Hsieh

On Sunday, 12 February 2012, I broadcast a new episode of my live Philosophy in Action Webcast, where I answer questions on the application of rational principles to the challenges of living a virtuous, happy, and free life in a live, hour-long webcast. The webcast is broadcast live every Sunday morning at 8 am PT / 9 am MT / 10 am CT / 11 am ET. In the webcast, I broadcast on video, Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers is on audio, and the audience is in a text chat.

As usual, if you can't attend the live webcast, you can listen to it later as audio-only podcast by subscribing to the NoodleCast RSS Feed:

You can also peruse the archives, listening to whole episodes or just individual questions. The archives are sorted by date and by topic.

We hope that you'll join the live webcast, because that's more lively and engaging than the podcast. People talk merrily in the text chat while watching the webcast. Greg and I enjoy the immediate feedback of a live audience – the funny quips, serious comments, and follow-up questions. So please join the live webcast when you can!

The Podcast: Episode: 12 February 2012

Listen Now

    Duration: 1:00:04
Download the Episode
Subscribe to the Feed
The Segments: Episode: 12 February 2012

The following segments are marked as chapters in the M4A version of the podcast. Thanks to Tammy Perkins for helping compile the show notes!

Introduction (0:00)

Yesterday, I spoke on the foundations of rights and then a panel at a Liberty on the Rocks / Koch Foundation Workshop. I'll be giving a "Think!" lecture at CU Boulder on March 6th on moral perfection in Ayn Rand and Aristotle. SnowCon plans are well underway. I'm going to be moving NoodleFood to Philosophy in Action. Now I'm off to visit my sister, her husband, and their baby for few days! Busy me!

Question 1: Low Passion for Career (3:19)

What should I do if I have a good job but not burning professional ambition? I have a good job that pays well. I perform my job well to the best of my ability. But I don't feel about it the same way that Howard Roark felt about the field of architecture in The Fountainhead or that Dagny felt about the railroad business in Atlas Shrugged. I don't hate my job – I do enjoy the work and the people I work with. But it's not my burning passion. On a scale of 1-to-10, my paying job (and the overall field) is a 7, but I also have various non-paying outside hobbies and activities that are more of a 8 or 9 for me. Should I try to cultivate a strong passion for my paying job? Or look for a different line of work? Or ramp up my pursuit of various hobbies and outside activities that give me greater satisfaction on the side?

My Answer, In Brief: A person's work should serve his life, and sometimes that means choosing the one career that you're wildly passionate about, and sometimes that means choosing a career that you enjoy, but that enables you to pursue other values.

Links:
Question 2: Patriotism as a Virtue (16:29)

Is patriotism a virtue? Is patriotism towards America a virtue? Should a person "love America" – or is that just jingoistic nationalism?

My Answer, In Brief: The value of loyalty depends on who you're loyal to, and the value of patriotism depends on the nature of the country that you support, particularly its respect for individual rights.

Links:
Question 3: Artificial Intelligence (22:56)

Is artificial intelligence possible? Can consciousness be created on a purely logical system such as a computer? Might consciousness and even free will somehow "emerge" out of a purely logical system? Also, what do you think of the "Turing Test" as a test of intelligence?

My Answer, In Brief: The question is a scientific one, and it cannot be answered yet.

Links:
Question 4: Boycotting Chick-Fil-A (33:37)

Should people boycott Chick-Fil-A for its hostility to gays? The fast food chain Chick-Fil-A is well-known for its promotion of Christian values. In recent years, the company has actively worked against gay marriage, in alliance with other organizations promoting the imposition of biblical commands by law. More generally, the company is hostile to same-sex couples. Given that Chick-Fil-A uses money from customers and shareholders to promote theocracy and other rights-violations, should people condemn and boycott the chain?

My Answer, In Brief: If a company takes a stand on some cultural or political issue, then potential customers can and should judge them on that basis. In some cases, a boycott is the right choice.

Links:
Rapid Fire Questions (48:47)

In this segment, I answered a variety of questions off-the-cuff. The questions were:
  • Are there any other Objectivist podcasts you would recommend?

  • What should the US's policy toward Israel be?

  • What do you think of Obamacare/contraception controversy?

  • How much weight should be given to a candidate's words versus his past actions?

  • What do you think of Bruce Springsteen, given that he's thrown his weight behind some liberal causes but he was also very idealistic for most of his career?

  • Is it wrong to use abortion as "birth control"?

  • What is the paleo diet? Is it roast beast for breakfast, lunch, and dinner? What are the health benefits?
Conclusion (59:09)

Comments or questions? Contact us!
Support the Webcast

The Philosophy in Action Webcast is available to anyone, free of charge. We love doing it, but it's not free for us to produce: it requires our time, effort, and money. So if you enjoy and value what we're doing, please contribute to the webcast's tip jar!





If you'd like to make a one-time contribution in an amount not listed, use this link. For instructions on canceling or revising your monthly contribution, visit the support page.

Thank you, if you've contributed to the webcast! You make our work possible every week, and we're so grateful for that! Also, whether you're able to contribute financially or not, we always appreciate your helping us spread the word about this webcast to anyone you think might be interested, as well as submitting and voting on questions for upcoming webcasts.

Read more...

Back to TOP